Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39441 - 39450 of 62360 for child support.

[MS WORD] FA-4127VA: Stipulation for Temporary Order without Minor Children
the payments will begin. A. Maintenance (Spousal Support). 1) Petitioner/Joint Petitioner
/formdisplay/FA-4127VA.doc?formNumber=FA-4127VA&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2023-01-05

[PDF] State v. Norbert J. Maday
that the evidence was insufficient to support the intimidation of a victim conviction, that evidence was improperly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8774 - 2017-09-19

State v. Oto Orlik
crimes earlier would not tend to support a finding that he did not have a mental disease at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4195 - 2005-03-31

County of Winnebago v. Larry A. Schmitz
was more credible than Schmitz, he cites to no authority or precedent to support his argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3227 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
that factual disputes were resolved in a manner that supports the circuit court’s ultimate decision. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49411 - 2010-04-28

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. The investigatory stop must be supported by reasonable suspicion, the “‘specific and articulable facts which
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=343880 - 2021-03-09

Reynauld Quiles v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins.
be affirmed “‘if there is any credible evidence to support [it].’” Id. (citation omitted). This is more
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14638 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jackson D. Carpenter
evidence supporting the necessary finding, and none opposing it. Carpenter disagrees that the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16060 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
identification] was necessary due to exigent circumstances is supported by the record and the evidence.” Dodd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33902 - 2008-09-02

COURT OF APPEALS
arguments in support of his motion to suppress. We uphold the trial court’s denial of the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30941 - 2007-11-20