Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39451 - 39460 of 84704 for judgment for m s n.
Search results 39451 - 39460 of 84704 for judgment for m s n.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. Frank M. Gagliardi Circuit Court Judge Electronic Notice Rebecca Matoska-Mentink Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=970255 - 2025-06-18
. Frank M. Gagliardi Circuit Court Judge Electronic Notice Rebecca Matoska-Mentink Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=970255 - 2025-06-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
-RESPONDENTS. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Portage County: JON M. COUNSELL
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30419 - 2014-09-15
-RESPONDENTS. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Portage County: JON M. COUNSELL
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30419 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. Frank M. Gagliardi Circuit Court Judge Electronic Notice Rebecca Matoska-Mentink Clerk
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=970255 - 2025-06-18
. Frank M. Gagliardi Circuit Court Judge Electronic Notice Rebecca Matoska-Mentink Clerk
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=970255 - 2025-06-18
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
February 9, 2023 judgment of conviction should be vacated. As the appellant, Ebensperger bears
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054558 - 2025-12-23
February 9, 2023 judgment of conviction should be vacated. As the appellant, Ebensperger bears
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054558 - 2025-12-23
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
February 9, 2023 judgment of conviction should be vacated. As the appellant, Ebensperger bears
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054558 - 2025-12-23
February 9, 2023 judgment of conviction should be vacated. As the appellant, Ebensperger bears
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054558 - 2025-12-23
COURT OF APPEALS
Wisconsin Stat. § 973.13 states that “[i]n any case where the court imposes a maximum penalty in excess
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35638 - 2009-02-23
Wisconsin Stat. § 973.13 states that “[i]n any case where the court imposes a maximum penalty in excess
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35638 - 2009-02-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
be modified from seventeen years to ten years. ¶3 WISCONSIN STAT. § 973.13 states that “[i]n any case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35638 - 2014-09-15
be modified from seventeen years to ten years. ¶3 WISCONSIN STAT. § 973.13 states that “[i]n any case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35638 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, V. JUAN RAMONE CAMACHO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=378726 - 2021-06-22
, V. JUAN RAMONE CAMACHO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=378726 - 2021-06-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
the underlying judgment. See Chicago & N. W. R.R. v. LIRC, 91 Wis. 2d 462, 472, 283 N.W.2d 603 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33850 - 2014-09-15
the underlying judgment. See Chicago & N. W. R.R. v. LIRC, 91 Wis. 2d 462, 472, 283 N.W.2d 603 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33850 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 806.07 may not be reviewed in the context of an appeal from the underlying judgment. See Chicago & N. W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33850 - 2008-08-27
. § 806.07 may not be reviewed in the context of an appeal from the underlying judgment. See Chicago & N. W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33850 - 2008-08-27

