Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39461 - 39470 of 83812 for simple case search.
Search results 39461 - 39470 of 83812 for simple case search.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
convicting him of attempted first-degree intentional homicide as a repeater. The sole issue in this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264671 - 2020-06-17
convicting him of attempted first-degree intentional homicide as a repeater. The sole issue in this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264671 - 2020-06-17
State v. Sheryl D. Stuckey
, 1994, and January 31, 1995.[4] The instant case involves a charge of operating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12850 - 2005-03-31
, 1994, and January 31, 1995.[4] The instant case involves a charge of operating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12850 - 2005-03-31
State v. Johnny M. McAdoo
information; and (3) whether the penalty enhancers were properly applied in this case. We affirm in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24926 - 2006-04-26
information; and (3) whether the penalty enhancers were properly applied in this case. We affirm in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24926 - 2006-04-26
State v. Jason D. VanStraten
documentation regarding the Intoxalyzer machine; however, the court stated: “No, you have put your case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6604 - 2005-03-31
documentation regarding the Intoxalyzer machine; however, the court stated: “No, you have put your case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6604 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117960 - 2014-07-29
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117960 - 2014-07-29
CA Blank Order
affirm the judgment. On June 24, 2004, in Milwaukee County Circuit Court case No. 2003PA6050, Jimenez
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118128 - 2014-07-22
affirm the judgment. On June 24, 2004, in Milwaukee County Circuit Court case No. 2003PA6050, Jimenez
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118128 - 2014-07-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for relief. Upon review, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case has been before this court multiple times
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=315702 - 2020-12-22
for relief. Upon review, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case has been before this court multiple times
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=315702 - 2020-12-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and without the guardian ad litem (GAL) waiving his attendance in writing prior to the hearing. This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135538 - 2017-09-21
and without the guardian ad litem (GAL) waiving his attendance in writing prior to the hearing. This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135538 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
and explainable basis” with “delineation of the primary sentencing factors to the particular facts of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26957 - 2014-09-15
and explainable basis” with “delineation of the primary sentencing factors to the particular facts of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26957 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. William C. Rosenberg
occurred in 1989 and 1996. Both cases involved civil forfeitures and were adjudicated in municipal court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2764 - 2017-09-19
occurred in 1989 and 1996. Both cases involved civil forfeitures and were adjudicated in municipal court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2764 - 2017-09-19