Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39461 - 39470 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Search results 39461 - 39470 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Diana M. Anderson v. Sauk Prairie Memorial Hospital
review the trial court’s decision to grant summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15833 - 2005-03-31
review the trial court’s decision to grant summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15833 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
in the loss of their dog. Society did not appear at trial, and the circuit court entered a default judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53541 - 2010-08-24
in the loss of their dog. Society did not appear at trial, and the circuit court entered a default judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53541 - 2010-08-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, “appellants”) appeal from an order of the circuit court denying their motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76801 - 2014-09-15
, “appellants”) appeal from an order of the circuit court denying their motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76801 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Production Credit Association of Southeast Wisconsin v. Gorton Farms
reverse the trial court’s holding to the contrary. Gorton Farms is a partnership whose business is crop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11626 - 2017-09-19
reverse the trial court’s holding to the contrary. Gorton Farms is a partnership whose business is crop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11626 - 2017-09-19
Neil S. Hubbard v. Shaun Messer
Hubbard’s attorney fees.[1] The trial court ruled that the purpose of Wis. Stat. § 109.11 was to penalize
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5406 - 2005-03-31
Hubbard’s attorney fees.[1] The trial court ruled that the purpose of Wis. Stat. § 109.11 was to penalize
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5406 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Terry H. Redmond
of physical injury. We agree with the trial court, however, that the officer was not so justified, and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12536 - 2017-09-21
of physical injury. We agree with the trial court, however, that the officer was not so justified, and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12536 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Thomas A. Mikulance
argued that “[t]he State and trial court failed to inform [him] of the maximum penalties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21764 - 2017-09-21
argued that “[t]he State and trial court failed to inform [him] of the maximum penalties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21764 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Timothy L. Kaelin
), STATS., all as a repeater contrary to § 939.62, STATS. A preliminary hearing was held and the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8017 - 2017-09-19
), STATS., all as a repeater contrary to § 939.62, STATS. A preliminary hearing was held and the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8017 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of party-to-a-crime liability; (3) Carter pled to non-existent crimes; and (4) trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174450 - 2017-09-21
of party-to-a-crime liability; (3) Carter pled to non-existent crimes; and (4) trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174450 - 2017-09-21
Jeffrey A. Smith v. Menard, Inc.
the refund. ¶5 On September 23, 2002, Smith commenced this action. After a court trial, a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7265 - 2011-07-25
the refund. ¶5 On September 23, 2002, Smith commenced this action. After a court trial, a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7265 - 2011-07-25