Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39471 - 39480 of 83431 for simple case search.
Search results 39471 - 39480 of 83431 for simple case search.
Professional Guardianships, Inc. v. Ruth E. J.
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9411 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9411 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Ernest J.P., Jr.
the statute, which does not purport to dictate how the county must prove its case for recommitment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7128 - 2017-09-20
the statute, which does not purport to dictate how the county must prove its case for recommitment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7128 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
. Affirmed. Background ¶2 Kay & Kay represented Stangler in two separate cases and billed legal fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141299 - 2015-05-05
. Affirmed. Background ¶2 Kay & Kay represented Stangler in two separate cases and billed legal fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141299 - 2015-05-05
[PDF]
Rebecca J. Atwood v. Robert E. Atwood
, used for pre-retirement personal objectives. Robert argues that the court erred because cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12927 - 2017-09-21
, used for pre-retirement personal objectives. Robert argues that the court erred because cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12927 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=659760 - 2023-05-25
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=659760 - 2023-05-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
case—also engaged in improper ex parte communications with Judge Bitney through ESM. We decline
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246148 - 2019-09-04
case—also engaged in improper ex parte communications with Judge Bitney through ESM. We decline
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246148 - 2019-09-04
[PDF]
State v. Frederick J. Brissette
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-2152 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14317 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-2152 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14317 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
cited no case law supporting his novel theory that a defendant relying upon his attorney’s advice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97429 - 2014-09-15
cited no case law supporting his novel theory that a defendant relying upon his attorney’s advice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97429 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Michael G.
in this case is transparent and puerile. We also caution counsel that recitation of “facts” without citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12566 - 2017-09-21
in this case is transparent and puerile. We also caution counsel that recitation of “facts” without citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12566 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Larry T.E.
and referring his case to the adult criminal circuit court. Larry claims that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12958 - 2017-09-21
and referring his case to the adult criminal circuit court. Larry claims that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12958 - 2017-09-21