Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39471 - 39480 of 83395 for simple case search.

State v. Michael Adam Watts
. Watts cites established case law for the proposition that a lesser included offense instruction must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2182 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. Williams contends that the standard jury instruction used in his case was misleading and resulted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56874 - 2010-11-17

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. STAT. §§ 939.50(3)(a), 939.63(1)(b). Pursuant to a plea bargain, Dubose resolved the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143202 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Appeal No. 2010AP2705 Cir. Ct. No. 2009CV1813
to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.61 this court certifies the appeal in this case to the Wisconsin Supreme Court
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69689 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Jonathon R. Torres
2003 WI App 199 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 03-0233
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6102 - 2017-09-19

State v. Robert Vargas
in the past he admitted it and took his punishment but that he did not make such an admission in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8463 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 20, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
. BACKGROUND ¶2 On April 29, 1996, Jones pled guilty, in two cases, to a total of three counts of armed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28502 - 2007-03-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
what a reasonable officer could infer from this response. ¶6 To begin, the cases cited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264840 - 2020-06-18

State v. Brandy Albert Essex
or previously,” and claims that the sentence in this case violates § 973.15(2)(a) because it could run
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7393 - 2005-03-31

State v. Ernest J.P., Jr.
has misinterpreted the statute, which does not purport to dictate how the county must prove its case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7128 - 2005-03-31