Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39481 - 39490 of 69399 for as he.
Search results 39481 - 39490 of 69399 for as he.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. He also challenges an order finding that he unreasonably refused to submit to blood alcohol testing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241002 - 2019-05-23
. He also challenges an order finding that he unreasonably refused to submit to blood alcohol testing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241002 - 2019-05-23
COURT OF APPEALS
challenges the Board’s issuance of the administrative warning on several grounds. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145377 - 2015-07-29
challenges the Board’s issuance of the administrative warning on several grounds. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145377 - 2015-07-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
time. Less than one month after Barfell was placed on probation, he tested positive for a variety
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=381396 - 2021-06-30
time. Less than one month after Barfell was placed on probation, he tested positive for a variety
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=381396 - 2021-06-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
confirmed both that he had sufficient time to 1 All
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107373 - 2017-09-21
confirmed both that he had sufficient time to 1 All
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107373 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
appeals a judgment convicting him of eighth offense operating a vehicle while intoxicated (OWI).[1] He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141760 - 2015-05-13
appeals a judgment convicting him of eighth offense operating a vehicle while intoxicated (OWI).[1] He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141760 - 2015-05-13
[PDF]
State v. Maxie W. Harvey, Jr.
supreme court declared in State v. Hansford, 219 Wis.2d 226, 230, 580 N.W.2d 171, 173 (1998), after he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14461 - 2017-09-21
supreme court declared in State v. Hansford, 219 Wis.2d 226, 230, 580 N.W.2d 171, 173 (1998), after he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14461 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
because it imposed discipline on him without a finding that he was the person who committed the alleged
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=859021 - 2024-10-10
because it imposed discipline on him without a finding that he was the person who committed the alleged
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=859021 - 2024-10-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
because it imposed discipline on him without a finding that he was the person who committed the alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=859021 - 2024-10-10
because it imposed discipline on him without a finding that he was the person who committed the alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=859021 - 2024-10-10
CA Blank Order
from cases he describes as “shar[ing] a common basis in events, facts and other circumstances.” As we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95945 - 2013-04-22
from cases he describes as “shar[ing] a common basis in events, facts and other circumstances.” As we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95945 - 2013-04-22
State v. Bobby D. Swift
safety (while armed), contrary to §§ 940.01(1), 943.32(2), 941.30(1), 939.63 and 939.05, Stats. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10685 - 2005-03-31
safety (while armed), contrary to §§ 940.01(1), 943.32(2), 941.30(1), 939.63 and 939.05, Stats. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10685 - 2005-03-31