Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3951 - 3960 of 30136 for consulta de causas.
Search results 3951 - 3960 of 30136 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
Maurice Fort Greer v. Lawrence Stahowiak
review the circuit court’s decision de novo. State ex rel. Milwaukee Police Ass’n v. Jones, 2000 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19737 - 2017-09-21
review the circuit court’s decision de novo. State ex rel. Milwaukee Police Ass’n v. Jones, 2000 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19737 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Paul J. May v. Tri-County Trails Commission
set of facts is a question of law which this court reviews de novo, without deference to the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12145 - 2017-09-21
set of facts is a question of law which this court reviews de novo, without deference to the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12145 - 2017-09-21
State v. William F. Jorgensen
, whether the deficient performance prejudiced the defendant present questions of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6647 - 2005-03-31
, whether the deficient performance prejudiced the defendant present questions of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6647 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Grant County: robert p. van de hey, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 VERGERONT, J.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30342 - 2007-09-19
of the circuit court for Grant County: robert p. van de hey, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 VERGERONT, J.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30342 - 2007-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
4 Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Neumann
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162922 - 2017-09-21
4 Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Neumann
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162922 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Diane Antczak v. River Hills South Investors
applies to a given set of facts presents a question of law we review de novo. See id. Antczak argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12682 - 2017-09-21
applies to a given set of facts presents a question of law we review de novo. See id. Antczak argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12682 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for a directed verdict is subject to this court’s de novo review. See Millonig v. Bakken, 112 Wis. 2d 445, 450
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=736829 - 2023-12-07
for a directed verdict is subject to this court’s de novo review. See Millonig v. Bakken, 112 Wis. 2d 445, 450
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=736829 - 2023-12-07
[PDF]
Lou Emma Hale v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3950 - 2017-09-20
of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3950 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Mark R. Lowe
subject to de novo review. State v. Gaulrapp, 207 Wis. 2d 600, 604, 558 N.W.2d 696 (Ct. App. 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3907 - 2017-09-20
subject to de novo review. State v. Gaulrapp, 207 Wis. 2d 600, 604, 558 N.W.2d 696 (Ct. App. 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3907 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Kelvin Griffin
and prejudicial” de novo. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d at 127-28, 449 N.W.2d at 848. Further, we review the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8573 - 2017-09-19
and prejudicial” de novo. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d at 127-28, 449 N.W.2d at 848. Further, we review the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8573 - 2017-09-19