Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3951 - 3960 of 29928 for des.
Search results 3951 - 3960 of 29928 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226709 - 2018-11-08
court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226709 - 2018-11-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review its application of a No. 2015AP1589-CR 4 statute de novo. State v. Iverson, 2015 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173983 - 2017-09-21
review its application of a No. 2015AP1589-CR 4 statute de novo. State v. Iverson, 2015 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173983 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law that we review de novo. See Kaloti Enters., 283 Wis. 2d 555, ¶10. ¶14 Here, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234113 - 2019-02-06
a question of law that we review de novo. See Kaloti Enters., 283 Wis. 2d 555, ¶10. ¶14 Here, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234113 - 2019-02-06
[PDF]
Milwaukee Employes' Retirement System v. City of Milwaukee
of a trial court’s grant or denial of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14067 - 2014-09-15
of a trial court’s grant or denial of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14067 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. We review de novo whether the circuit court applied the proper legal standard. Id. “The burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72293 - 2014-09-15
. We review de novo whether the circuit court applied the proper legal standard. Id. “The burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72293 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
—present questions of law we review de novo. Id., 153 Wis. 2d at 128, 449 N.W.2d at 848. A. Alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50752 - 2014-09-15
—present questions of law we review de novo. Id., 153 Wis. 2d at 128, 449 N.W.2d at 848. A. Alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50752 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Mark Sevelin
an ownership interest. Statutory interpretation is a question of law we review de novo. State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10531 - 2017-09-20
an ownership interest. Statutory interpretation is a question of law we review de novo. State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10531 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
We review summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Hardy v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34053 - 2014-09-15
We review summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Hardy v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34053 - 2014-09-15
Appeal No
responded with a claim for injunctive relief and a request for de novo review of the District’s decision
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26905 - 2006-10-24
responded with a claim for injunctive relief and a request for de novo review of the District’s decision
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26905 - 2006-10-24
State v. Alan D. Hayden
or constitutional standard is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Hughes, 2000 WI 24, ¶15, 233
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21003 - 2006-01-18
or constitutional standard is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Hughes, 2000 WI 24, ¶15, 233
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21003 - 2006-01-18