Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3951 - 3960 of 24568 for extending.
Search results 3951 - 3960 of 24568 for extending.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
confinement and fifteen years’ extended supervision. The court accepted the pleas and imposed concurrent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158421 - 2017-09-21
confinement and fifteen years’ extended supervision. The court accepted the pleas and imposed concurrent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158421 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
term (thirteen years of initial confinement and seven years of extended supervision). In fashioning
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143763 - 2017-09-21
term (thirteen years of initial confinement and seven years of extended supervision). In fashioning
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143763 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
under Wis. Stat. Rule 809.30 is extended. Regan pled no contest. At sentencing the court ordered Regan
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134592 - 2015-02-03
under Wis. Stat. Rule 809.30 is extended. Regan pled no contest. At sentencing the court ordered Regan
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134592 - 2015-02-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
years of initial confinement and four years of extended supervision. By counsel, Miller filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=736835 - 2023-12-07
years of initial confinement and four years of extended supervision. By counsel, Miller filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=736835 - 2023-12-07
COURT OF APPEALS
terms of three years’ initial confinement and two years’ extended supervision for domestic abuse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61128 - 2011-03-14
terms of three years’ initial confinement and two years’ extended supervision for domestic abuse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61128 - 2011-03-14
COURT OF APPEALS
to twenty years’ imprisonment—ten years’ initial confinement and ten years’ extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90237 - 2012-12-10
to twenty years’ imprisonment—ten years’ initial confinement and ten years’ extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90237 - 2012-12-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and ten years of extended supervision) and eight years for second-degree recklessly endangering safety
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253647 - 2020-02-12
and ten years of extended supervision) and eight years for second-degree recklessly endangering safety
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253647 - 2020-02-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
by 6 years of extended supervision. The no-merit report addresses whether there was sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039505 - 2025-11-18
by 6 years of extended supervision. The no-merit report addresses whether there was sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039505 - 2025-11-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of extended supervision on the first count, and a concurrent sentence of one year of initial confinement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=558449 - 2022-08-23
of extended supervision on the first count, and a concurrent sentence of one year of initial confinement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=558449 - 2022-08-23
CA Blank Order
a no-merit report concluding there is no arguable basis for Karen to challenge orders extending her
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95445 - 2013-04-15
a no-merit report concluding there is no arguable basis for Karen to challenge orders extending her
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95445 - 2013-04-15