Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3951 - 3960 of 63530 for records.
Search results 3951 - 3960 of 63530 for records.
State v. Scott L. Snow
unreasonable or unjustified basis for the sentence in the record. Id. at 622-23. ¶6 The primary factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5261 - 2005-03-31
unreasonable or unjustified basis for the sentence in the record. Id. at 622-23. ¶6 The primary factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5261 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
to Appear and Show Cause” (Document 541 in the Record), and the second is an order entitled “Post Judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=769595 - 2024-02-28
to Appear and Show Cause” (Document 541 in the Record), and the second is an order entitled “Post Judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=769595 - 2024-02-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).1 Voss filed a response. After reviewing the record, counsel’s report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=300358 - 2020-10-29
, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).1 Voss filed a response. After reviewing the record, counsel’s report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=300358 - 2020-10-29
[PDF]
State v. Eugene E.
. v. State, 162 Wis.2d 940, 960, 471 N.W.2d 493, 501 (1991). We will reverse only if the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13179 - 2017-09-21
. v. State, 162 Wis.2d 940, 960, 471 N.W.2d 493, 501 (1991). We will reverse only if the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13179 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the February 5, 2018 order states on its face that it is “final,” the record reflects that a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249699 - 2019-11-07
the February 5, 2018 order states on its face that it is “final,” the record reflects that a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249699 - 2019-11-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
matter, and it’s still of—is a valid conviction and it’s on your record; is that correct? Holan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77416 - 2014-09-15
matter, and it’s still of—is a valid conviction and it’s on your record; is that correct? Holan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77416 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of a new factor, much less by clear and convincing evidence. Indeed, the record belies Nelson’s assertions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93708 - 2013-03-04
of a new factor, much less by clear and convincing evidence. Indeed, the record belies Nelson’s assertions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93708 - 2013-03-04
State v. Brian C. Wegner
on the record that it considered Wegner’s positive adjustments while on probation. ¶7 The record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16239 - 2005-03-31
on the record that it considered Wegner’s positive adjustments while on probation. ¶7 The record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16239 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171584 - 2017-09-21
. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171584 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
report. We have reviewed the Record in light of counsel’s reports and Willis’s responses. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913151 - 2025-02-12
report. We have reviewed the Record in light of counsel’s reports and Willis’s responses. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913151 - 2025-02-12