Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39501 - 39510 of 84000 for case search.

State v. Clayton T. Veldt
This case involves three separate OWI offenses. Veldt’s first arrest occurred on September 13, 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5357 - 2005-03-31

State v. Juan B. Garcia
to the State’s failure to comply with a pretrial discovery order. We agree, and reverse and remand the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6313 - 2005-03-31

State v. Elijio M. Servantez
and still be intoxicated. Second, there are cases far too numerous to mention that show how a person can
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6339 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
of this case. ¶5 The court deemed the Riordans’ reliance on Arlee’s income to be a serious conflict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36053 - 2009-04-01

[PDF] Cynthia J. Hinojosa v. Joe R. Hinojosa
remanded. Before Brown, Nettesheim and Anderson, JJ. PER CURIAM. In court of appeals case No. 96
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11697 - 2017-09-20

State v. Jawun B.
Court Center who supervised Jawun’s case between December 17, 1998, when Jawun was arrested, and June 8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15774 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=687552 - 2023-08-09

State v. Charles R. Seibel
of the circuit court. ¶2 The sole issue in this case is whether the trial court properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6857 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, “Protection of the community is absolutely, positively 99 percent of everything in this case.” The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169907 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Winnebago County Department of Health and Human Services v. Bruce H.
In this termination of parental rights case, the trial court, without the benefit of this court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6452 - 2017-09-19