Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39501 - 39510 of 63789 for records/1000.
Search results 39501 - 39510 of 63789 for records/1000.
State v. Lamart C. Cammon
. Based on our review of the no merit report, Cammon’s response, and the record, we conclude that further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14898 - 2005-03-31
. Based on our review of the no merit report, Cammon’s response, and the record, we conclude that further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14898 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
” at sentencing, these claims are unaccompanied by citations to the Record. This court will not independently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34277 - 2014-09-15
” at sentencing, these claims are unaccompanied by citations to the Record. This court will not independently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34277 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(Walworth county case No. 2002CM211) than the present one.6 ¶10 Upon review of the record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89187 - 2014-09-15
(Walworth county case No. 2002CM211) than the present one.6 ¶10 Upon review of the record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89187 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the hearing, the court stated that, based on the parties’ agreement as presented to the court, the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=888119 - 2024-12-12
of the hearing, the court stated that, based on the parties’ agreement as presented to the court, the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=888119 - 2024-12-12
Robert M. Pace v. Oneida County
of this record because the Paces did not appeal the board's decision to the circuit court. We derive information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13242 - 2005-03-31
of this record because the Paces did not appeal the board's decision to the circuit court. We derive information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13242 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, referred to in the record and in the parties’ briefs as Outlot 1. Outlot 1 lies between farmland owned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134443 - 2015-02-04
, referred to in the record and in the parties’ briefs as Outlot 1. Outlot 1 lies between farmland owned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134443 - 2015-02-04
COURT OF APPEALS
of Martin’s driving were his drifting and jerkiness described above. Nothing in the record about Martin’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35381 - 2009-02-02
of Martin’s driving were his drifting and jerkiness described above. Nothing in the record about Martin’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35381 - 2009-02-02
Village of Jackson v. Richard P. Hamann, Jr.
] Given these omissions in Hamann's brief, we have on our own initiative examined the appellate record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11194 - 2005-03-31
] Given these omissions in Hamann's brief, we have on our own initiative examined the appellate record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11194 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Craig A. Zempel
driving record indicated that he had been convicted of OMVWI on two prior occasions within the preceding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14285 - 2014-09-15
driving record indicated that he had been convicted of OMVWI on two prior occasions within the preceding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14285 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record, we summarily affirm the judgment and the order because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249158 - 2019-10-22
and an independent review of the record, we summarily affirm the judgment and the order because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249158 - 2019-10-22