Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39511 - 39520 of 61903 for does.

State v. Michael A. Simmons
” means. Nor does the statute give any guidance as to where the line is drawn in order to obey the “avoid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5489 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and the deficient performance prejudiced Miranda. See Strickland, 466 U.S. at 687. Miranda does not allege
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=916439 - 2025-02-19

State v. Trevor A. McKee
understood the nature of the offenses. McKee does not claim here, nor did he in the trial court, that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11975 - 2005-03-31

Richard D. Price, Jr. v. Zimbrick, Inc.
does not make any allegations regarding ownership. It simply alleges that Whitewater Motors issued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14550 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
of the pickup, the circuit court found her testimony not credible. Capetillo does not challenge the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79224 - 2012-03-07

[PDF] Joe Tynan v. JBVBB, LLC
, and that the interim agreement covering November to December 1999, does not affect the oral contract. He points
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6088 - 2017-09-19

Aaron T. Rouse v. Theda Clark Medical Center, Inc.
with the University of Wisconsin Board of Regents, Wis. Stat. § 233.04. The state does not finance the UWHCA
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26113 - 2006-08-08

State v. Gerald D. Schrank
in this case does not even remotely approach those situations in prior cases that prompted the need for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7001 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Mary L. Brice v. Roger Garfield Dale Miller, Sr.
does not dispute that some maintenance was appropriate, but challenges the amount and duration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14587 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Brown County Department of Human Services v. Virjean L.
. When the trial court does not provide reasoning for its evidentiary decision, the appellate court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26560 - 2017-09-21