Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39521 - 39530 of 57389 for id.
Search results 39521 - 39530 of 57389 for id.
COURT OF APPEALS
-part standard. Id., ¶30. ¶11 Anderson contends that “the courts should understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64236 - 2011-05-16
-part standard. Id., ¶30. ¶11 Anderson contends that “the courts should understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64236 - 2011-05-16
WI App 7 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP62 Complete Title of Ca...
agencies and not the unnamed State. See id. ¶8 Wisconsin Stat. § 88.87 sets forth the procedures
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90425 - 2013-01-29
agencies and not the unnamed State. See id. ¶8 Wisconsin Stat. § 88.87 sets forth the procedures
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90425 - 2013-01-29
COURT OF APPEALS
presents a question of law that we review de novo. See id. at 797-98. ¶8 Wisconsin Stat. § 968.24
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66557 - 2011-06-28
presents a question of law that we review de novo. See id. at 797-98. ¶8 Wisconsin Stat. § 968.24
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66557 - 2011-06-28
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Id., ¶1. One of his bases for making this argument was that his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93740 - 2014-09-15
ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Id., ¶1. One of his bases for making this argument was that his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93740 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Kay Hoverman v. Chuck Frautschi
law.” Id. Frautschi first attacks the provision enjoining any contact with Hoverman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12735 - 2017-09-21
law.” Id. Frautschi first attacks the provision enjoining any contact with Hoverman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12735 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, our “review is limited to determining if discretion was erroneously exercised.” Id., ¶17
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192933 - 2017-09-21
, our “review is limited to determining if discretion was erroneously exercised.” Id., ¶17
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192933 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
or understand the information that should have been provided at the plea hearing.” Id., ¶39. Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195964 - 2017-09-21
or understand the information that should have been provided at the plea hearing.” Id., ¶39. Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195964 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the overall exercise of sentencing discretion. Id., ¶9. The circuit court declined to make Kane eligible
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150939 - 2017-09-21
of the overall exercise of sentencing discretion. Id., ¶9. The circuit court declined to make Kane eligible
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150939 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-CR 5 probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.” Id. (citations omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=282060 - 2020-08-27
-CR 5 probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.” Id. (citations omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=282060 - 2020-08-27
[PDF]
State v. Bobby J. Kemper
on the question of whether to take the plea offer. The court’s credibility findings are binding on us. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21001 - 2017-09-21
on the question of whether to take the plea offer. The court’s credibility findings are binding on us. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21001 - 2017-09-21