Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39531 - 39540 of 83001 for case codes/1000.

State v. Dennis P. Smith
continued the case for a week and advised Smith to “go to the Public Defender’s office today. Make sure you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19393 - 2005-08-24

[PDF] NOTICE
materials related to this case. Neuleib gave the copy to Bonner. In describing this situation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58199 - 2014-09-15

State v. Thomas W. Grimm
2002 WI App 242 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 01-0138-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3505 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
for reconsideration and suppressed the evidence. The court reasoned Bohman had “some impact” on this case because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106915 - 2014-01-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
under the age of thirteen, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 948.025(1).2 The victim in both cases is N.C.B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67971 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
indicated that current scholarship reveals false allegations in between three and ten percent of cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58142 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the residual hearsay exception, WIS. STAT. § 908.03(24). Therefore, we summarily affirm. This case arose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=970274 - 2025-06-17

State v. Richard C. Wos
further testified that at the close of the case, he told his trial counsel that “the jury had a right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2582 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jeremy G. Squires
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-3302-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11714 - 2005-03-31

State v. Loren L. Leiser
they watched a pornographic movie that Leiser selected. ¶4 The two cases were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2108 - 2005-03-31