Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39531 - 39540 of 76978 for judgment for u s.
Search results 39531 - 39540 of 76978 for judgment for u s.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The court stated that the “[s]ame reasoning” applied to Sparby-Duncan’s motion to dismiss the PAC charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1058517 - 2026-02-25
. The court stated that the “[s]ame reasoning” applied to Sparby-Duncan’s motion to dismiss the PAC charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1058517 - 2026-02-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
ruling and written order satisfy D.J.W.’s factual findings requirement and sufficient evidence exists
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=918301 - 2025-02-26
ruling and written order satisfy D.J.W.’s factual findings requirement and sufficient evidence exists
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=918301 - 2025-02-26
State v. James Lalor
, Respondent-Appellant. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Racine County: EMILY S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2830 - 2005-03-31
, Respondent-Appellant. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Racine County: EMILY S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2830 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Dennis Thiel
provides in part: Whenever a person who … has been committed under s. 980.06http
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6937 - 2017-09-20
provides in part: Whenever a person who … has been committed under s. 980.06http
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6937 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
by § 125.035(4)(b), which provides that “[s]ubsection (2) does not apply if the provider knew or should have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27903 - 2014-09-15
by § 125.035(4)(b), which provides that “[s]ubsection (2) does not apply if the provider knew or should have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27903 - 2014-09-15
Frontsheet
for the divorce judgment, the circuit court included the value of the goodwill attributable to the retail discount
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67825 - 2011-07-11
for the divorce judgment, the circuit court included the value of the goodwill attributable to the retail discount
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67825 - 2011-07-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and represented its will, not its judgment; and (4) whether the evidence was such that it might reasonably make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120143 - 2014-09-15
and represented its will, not its judgment; and (4) whether the evidence was such that it might reasonably make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120143 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the discrepancy, were “violation[s]” of the manual and that, therefore, the presumption of validity is overcome
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210393 - 2018-03-29
the discrepancy, were “violation[s]” of the manual and that, therefore, the presumption of validity is overcome
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210393 - 2018-03-29
[PDF]
State v. Drazen Markovic
sentences in a postconviction motion. This court affirmed the judgment of conviction and postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18341 - 2017-09-21
sentences in a postconviction motion. This court affirmed the judgment of conviction and postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18341 - 2017-09-21
State v. William A.H.
County: S. MICHAEL WILK, Judge. Affirmed. SNYDER, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12891 - 2005-03-31
County: S. MICHAEL WILK, Judge. Affirmed. SNYDER, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12891 - 2005-03-31