Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39531 - 39540 of 83431 for simple case search.
Search results 39531 - 39540 of 83431 for simple case search.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1028178 - 2025-10-29
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1028178 - 2025-10-29
COURT OF APPEALS
and Sherman, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. This is a worker’s compensation case that presents the issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55769 - 2010-10-20
and Sherman, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. This is a worker’s compensation case that presents the issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55769 - 2010-10-20
[PDF]
State v. William H. Thornton, Jr.
Supreme Court decided the Howard case. On April 2, 1998, acting pro se, Thornton filed another WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3997 - 2017-09-20
Supreme Court decided the Howard case. On April 2, 1998, acting pro se, Thornton filed another WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3997 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2010AP2705 Cir. Ct. No. 2009CV1813
to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.61 this court certifies the appeal in this case to the Wisconsin Supreme Court
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69689 - 2014-09-15
to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.61 this court certifies the appeal in this case to the Wisconsin Supreme Court
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69689 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Gary and Lisa Marifke v. Aluminum Industries Corp.
of proof at trial has failed to demonstrate the existence of an element essential to that party’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13264 - 2017-09-21
of proof at trial has failed to demonstrate the existence of an element essential to that party’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13264 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2009AP3080-CR 3 ¶4 Trial counsel’s sentencing argument highlighted “positives” in Patterson’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63727 - 2014-09-15
. No. 2009AP3080-CR 3 ¶4 Trial counsel’s sentencing argument highlighted “positives” in Patterson’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63727 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
remedy appropriate to the needs of the particular case, the court’s discretion is nearly unlimited. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98455 - 2014-09-15
remedy appropriate to the needs of the particular case, the court’s discretion is nearly unlimited. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98455 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Brad E. Glaunert
. ¶12 The matter proceeded to a two-day jury trial in June 2002. At the close of the State’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5873 - 2017-09-19
. ¶12 The matter proceeded to a two-day jury trial in June 2002. At the close of the State’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5873 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
deficiency. The court reasoned that, given the facts of the case, there was reasonable suspicion to extend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103040 - 2013-10-14
deficiency. The court reasoned that, given the facts of the case, there was reasonable suspicion to extend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103040 - 2013-10-14
State v. Nicholas R. Simonet
. Whether probable cause exists is assessed on a case-by-case basis; field sobriety tests are not always
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15007 - 2005-03-31
. Whether probable cause exists is assessed on a case-by-case basis; field sobriety tests are not always
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15007 - 2005-03-31