Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39531 - 39540 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 39531 - 39540 of 58492 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. William T. Ackerman
denied by the trial court, and raises the following issues on appeal: (1) whether the officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11637 - 2017-09-19
denied by the trial court, and raises the following issues on appeal: (1) whether the officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11637 - 2017-09-19
State v. John E. Stephens
months. The trial court rejected Stephens's argument that the prior juvenile
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9457 - 2005-03-31
months. The trial court rejected Stephens's argument that the prior juvenile
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9457 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Tyrone L. Dubose
. He claims the trial court erred by not suppressing Timothy Hiltsley’s identification of him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6619 - 2017-09-19
. He claims the trial court erred by not suppressing Timothy Hiltsley’s identification of him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6619 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
on the court and insists he is entitled to a new trial on that issue. Additionally, Lundt also appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29790 - 2014-09-15
on the court and insists he is entitled to a new trial on that issue. Additionally, Lundt also appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29790 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to suppress evidence in his 2009 case; that, in his 2011 case, trial counsel was ineffective for not moving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231518 - 2019-01-02
to suppress evidence in his 2009 case; that, in his 2011 case, trial counsel was ineffective for not moving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231518 - 2019-01-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to October 2011, and a 32-month period from February 2013 to October 2015. ¶5 At the jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175102 - 2017-09-21
to October 2011, and a 32-month period from February 2013 to October 2015. ¶5 At the jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175102 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that he reviewed the forms and attachments with his trial counsel and that he understood them. The plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218751 - 2018-09-05
that he reviewed the forms and attachments with his trial counsel and that he understood them. The plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218751 - 2018-09-05
[PDF]
State v. Jesse Liukonen
raise the issue of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. The State proposes, and we agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6576 - 2017-09-19
raise the issue of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. The State proposes, and we agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6576 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
following a jury trial, for first-degree reckless homicide, under the Len Bias law,1 as party to a crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965308 - 2025-06-04
following a jury trial, for first-degree reckless homicide, under the Len Bias law,1 as party to a crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965308 - 2025-06-04
[PDF]
State v. Michael Brandt
); § 943.20(1)(d). In July of 1996, after being bound over for trial, Brandt entered into a plea agreement
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17268 - 2017-09-21
); § 943.20(1)(d). In July of 1996, after being bound over for trial, Brandt entered into a plea agreement
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17268 - 2017-09-21