Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3961 - 3970 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Search results 3961 - 3970 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that it is de novo and the State argues for an erroneous exercise of discretion standard. Our supreme court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=379694 - 2021-06-23
that it is de novo and the State argues for an erroneous exercise of discretion standard. Our supreme court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=379694 - 2021-06-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law that we review de novo. State v. Romero-Georgana, 2014 WI 83, ¶30, 360 Wis. 2d 522, 849 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1004100 - 2025-09-03
of law that we review de novo. State v. Romero-Georgana, 2014 WI 83, ¶30, 360 Wis. 2d 522, 849 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1004100 - 2025-09-03
State v. Kirk J. Bergquist
interpretations are questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. City of Oak Creek, 2000 WI 9, ¶18, 232
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3764 - 2005-03-31
interpretations are questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. City of Oak Creek, 2000 WI 9, ¶18, 232
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3764 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Boyle. Adams protested the de novo nature of the new proceeding, asserting he had prepared
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132761 - 2015-01-12
Boyle. Adams protested the de novo nature of the new proceeding, asserting he had prepared
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132761 - 2015-01-12
[PDF]
WI APP 36
on our de novo review of the contract and the undisputed facts, we conclude that the contract does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59740 - 2014-09-15
on our de novo review of the contract and the undisputed facts, we conclude that the contract does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59740 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that Boone entered the plea knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily is a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=994951 - 2025-08-13
that Boone entered the plea knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily is a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=994951 - 2025-08-13
COURT OF APPEALS
. at 226.[2] Whether an individual’s speech is protected is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104910 - 2013-11-26
. at 226.[2] Whether an individual’s speech is protected is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104910 - 2013-11-26
Helen M. Rogers v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
. DISCUSSION We review the trial court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12013 - 2005-03-31
. DISCUSSION We review the trial court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12013 - 2005-03-31
09AP2841 State v. Michael S. Miske
is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Waldner, 206 Wis. 2d 51, 54, 556 N.W.2d 681 (1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49956 - 2010-05-18
is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Waldner, 206 Wis. 2d 51, 54, 556 N.W.2d 681 (1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49956 - 2010-05-18
Sauk County v. Robert M. Engelhardt
of drivers for intoxication. Statutory interpretation is a question of law, which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14476 - 2005-03-31
of drivers for intoxication. Statutory interpretation is a question of law, which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14476 - 2005-03-31