Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39601 - 39610 of 57333 for id.
Search results 39601 - 39610 of 57333 for id.
COURT OF APPEALS
of such discretion turns upon a question of law, however, we review the question de novo. Id. Here, the issue turns
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108494 - 2014-03-04
of such discretion turns upon a question of law, however, we review the question de novo. Id. Here, the issue turns
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108494 - 2014-03-04
[PDF]
State v. Emmanuel L. Branch
which supports the finding is the one that must be adopted.... Id. at 503-04 (citation omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15656 - 2017-09-21
which supports the finding is the one that must be adopted.... Id. at 503-04 (citation omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15656 - 2017-09-21
Paul Steven Screnock v. Malyn Screnock
changes are substantial is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. at 33, 577 N.W.2d at 37
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13895 - 2005-03-31
changes are substantial is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. at 33, 577 N.W.2d at 37
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13895 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
does not exist, the individual is not entitled to an evidentiary hearing. See id., ¶32. Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31305 - 2007-12-26
does not exist, the individual is not entitled to an evidentiary hearing. See id., ¶32. Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31305 - 2007-12-26
COURT OF APPEALS
authorized by any applicable penalty enhancement statute.” Id., ¶9. The court then bifurcates the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115008 - 2014-06-18
authorized by any applicable penalty enhancement statute.” Id., ¶9. The court then bifurcates the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115008 - 2014-06-18
[PDF]
Robert Waldman v. Greg Rea
of a rational mental process. See id. In determining whether a party’s failure to attend a hearing or to meet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2564 - 2017-09-19
of a rational mental process. See id. In determining whether a party’s failure to attend a hearing or to meet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2564 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
unknowing or involuntary or otherwise manifestly unjust. Id., ¶48. A defendant who seeks to withdraw his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206541 - 2018-01-03
unknowing or involuntary or otherwise manifestly unjust. Id., ¶48. A defendant who seeks to withdraw his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206541 - 2018-01-03
Buena Park Improvement Association v. Richard H. Sohr
N.W.2d 254 (Ct. App. 1999). The competing inferences, however, must be “reasonable.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19324 - 2005-08-16
N.W.2d 254 (Ct. App. 1999). The competing inferences, however, must be “reasonable.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19324 - 2005-08-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
standard. Id., ¶30. ¶11 Anderson contends that “the courts should understand that there was a direct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64236 - 2014-09-15
standard. Id., ¶30. ¶11 Anderson contends that “the courts should understand that there was a direct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64236 - 2014-09-15
State v. Jeffrey S. Tennant
and to provoke a disturbance. See id. at 541, 436 N.W.2d at 288. The evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13985 - 2005-03-31
and to provoke a disturbance. See id. at 541, 436 N.W.2d at 288. The evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13985 - 2005-03-31