Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39611 - 39620 of 63951 for records/1000.
Search results 39611 - 39620 of 63951 for records/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment states that the motion is granted for the reasons stated on the record and because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31208 - 2007-12-18
judgment states that the motion is granted for the reasons stated on the record and because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31208 - 2007-12-18
COURT OF APPEALS
does not affect our analysis of the record. [2] We note that although the trial court used the term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29356 - 2007-06-11
does not affect our analysis of the record. [2] We note that although the trial court used the term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29356 - 2007-06-11
[PDF]
NOTICE
to make a record. I have no problem with the pictures being up during openings as they are now, but I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42188 - 2014-09-15
to make a record. I have no problem with the pictures being up during openings as they are now, but I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42188 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
decision, “very disturbed by the fact that [Jimeca H.’s lawyer] testified that she keeps no written records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32404 - 2008-04-14
decision, “very disturbed by the fact that [Jimeca H.’s lawyer] testified that she keeps no written records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32404 - 2008-04-14
State v. Latasha J.
The court record clearly shows that Latasha was provided with sufficient and repeated warnings that her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6061 - 2005-03-31
The court record clearly shows that Latasha was provided with sufficient and repeated warnings that her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6061 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robin R. Fecci
. Reviewing the record, this court notes that the circuit court was incorrect in concluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14268 - 2005-03-31
. Reviewing the record, this court notes that the circuit court was incorrect in concluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14268 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
pleas: Q: Okay. But now, when you say going crazy, on the record it sounds like you mean you’re
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110227 - 2014-04-15
pleas: Q: Okay. But now, when you say going crazy, on the record it sounds like you mean you’re
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110227 - 2014-04-15
State v. Gary D. Kluczynski
.” We are unpersuaded. ¶12 First, Kluczynski misrepresents the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26066 - 2006-08-01
.” We are unpersuaded. ¶12 First, Kluczynski misrepresents the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26066 - 2006-08-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=718811 - 2023-10-24
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=718811 - 2023-10-24
COURT OF APPEALS
matters; and that there was no evidence of record that his participation in any program or rehabilitation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26638 - 2006-10-02
matters; and that there was no evidence of record that his participation in any program or rehabilitation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26638 - 2006-10-02