Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39611 - 39620 of 82345 for simple case.
Search results 39611 - 39620 of 82345 for simple case.
Rule Order
submit the redacted copy for the public case file. If the protected information is required by law
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147481 - 2015-08-30
submit the redacted copy for the public case file. If the protected information is required by law
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147481 - 2015-08-30
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case, then, is the BOA’s March 15, 2006 decision, not its December 2004 decision. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44488 - 2009-12-09
in this case, then, is the BOA’s March 15, 2006 decision, not its December 2004 decision. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44488 - 2009-12-09
COURT OF APPEALS
. by default. ¶4 On May 25, 2012, the court held a dispositional hearing on Aiden G-L.’s CHIPS case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129509 - 2014-11-25
. by default. ¶4 On May 25, 2012, the court held a dispositional hearing on Aiden G-L.’s CHIPS case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129509 - 2014-11-25
[PDF]
WI APP 127
2010 WI APP 127 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2009AP2021
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53542 - 2014-09-15
2010 WI APP 127 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2009AP2021
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53542 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
petition was filed while K.B.W. was facing three other delinquency cases. In the first case, he faced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=464306 - 2021-12-21
petition was filed while K.B.W. was facing three other delinquency cases. In the first case, he faced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=464306 - 2021-12-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. RULE 809.23(3). Based on my review of the briefs and record, I conclude that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=936463 - 2025-04-03
. RULE 809.23(3). Based on my review of the briefs and record, I conclude that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=936463 - 2025-04-03
State v. John A. Lein
the essence of the case was “he said, he said” credibility was crucial. Thus, argues Lein, if inconsistencies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14044 - 2005-03-31
the essence of the case was “he said, he said” credibility was crucial. Thus, argues Lein, if inconsistencies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14044 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
The case proceeded to trial4 in January 2021, during which the circuit court found that the State proved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=432415 - 2021-09-28
The case proceeded to trial4 in January 2021, during which the circuit court found that the State proved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=432415 - 2021-09-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, Crystal Dawkins, who was not on the State’s witness list, in its case-in-chief. For the reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=491659 - 2022-03-08
, Crystal Dawkins, who was not on the State’s witness list, in its case-in-chief. For the reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=491659 - 2022-03-08
COURT OF APPEALS
found by the agency in a contested case proceeding, the court shall not substitute its judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49312 - 2010-04-27
found by the agency in a contested case proceeding, the court shall not substitute its judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49312 - 2010-04-27