Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39611 - 39620 of 83814 for simple case search.
Search results 39611 - 39620 of 83814 for simple case search.
State v. Mark D. O'Kray
As noted above, the dispositive issue in this case is whether O’Kray’s plea was knowingly and voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12175 - 2005-03-31
As noted above, the dispositive issue in this case is whether O’Kray’s plea was knowingly and voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12175 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
cooperation. ¶4 Trial counsel’s sentencing argument highlighted “positives” in Patterson’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63727 - 2011-05-09
cooperation. ¶4 Trial counsel’s sentencing argument highlighted “positives” in Patterson’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63727 - 2011-05-09
Debra Christie v. John Husz
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-0807
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12239 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-0807
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12239 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-18).1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252302 - 2020-01-08
-18).1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252302 - 2020-01-08
[PDF]
NOTICE
the circuit court’s orders on procedural grounds. BACKGROUND ¶2 The background facts in this case were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50106 - 2014-09-15
the circuit court’s orders on procedural grounds. BACKGROUND ¶2 The background facts in this case were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50106 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm. Background
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204230 - 2017-11-28
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm. Background
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204230 - 2017-11-28
[PDF]
State v. Michael G.
in this case is transparent and puerile. We also caution counsel that recitation of “facts” without citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12566 - 2017-09-21
in this case is transparent and puerile. We also caution counsel that recitation of “facts” without citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12566 - 2017-09-21
State v. Michael G.
its competency to take action in the case after that date, including the temporary thirty-day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12566 - 2005-03-31
its competency to take action in the case after that date, including the temporary thirty-day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12566 - 2005-03-31
Susan Schindelholz v. Joseph Vincenti
), is analogous to her case; (3) the requirements for filing a notice of appeal and for filing a civil action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7336 - 2005-03-31
), is analogous to her case; (3) the requirements for filing a notice of appeal and for filing a civil action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7336 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=363238 - 2021-05-05
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=363238 - 2021-05-05