Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39621 - 39630 of 76979 for judgment for u s.
Search results 39621 - 39630 of 76979 for judgment for u s.
COURT OF APPEALS
commission’s conclusion that, “as an untreated sex offender, [he] pose[s] an unreasonable risk to the public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99252 - 2013-09-30
commission’s conclusion that, “as an untreated sex offender, [he] pose[s] an unreasonable risk to the public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99252 - 2013-09-30
State v. Stacey R.W.
as specified in s. 48.243 and shall be informed that a request for a jury trial or for a substitution of judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3131 - 2005-03-31
as specified in s. 48.243 and shall be informed that a request for a jury trial or for a substitution of judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3131 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Towanka S. King, Defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30039 - 2007-05-15
State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Towanka S. King, Defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30039 - 2007-05-15
State v. James M.C.
in the serious juvenile offender program under s. 938.538 or the adult intensive sanctions program under s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13335 - 2005-03-31
in the serious juvenile offender program under s. 938.538 or the adult intensive sanctions program under s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13335 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Frontsheet
of the court of appeals affirming a grant of partial summary judgment to the Department of Transportation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160974 - 2017-09-21
of the court of appeals affirming a grant of partial summary judgment to the Department of Transportation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160974 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and represented its will, not its judgment; and (4) whether the evidence was such that it might reasonably make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120143 - 2014-09-15
and represented its will, not its judgment; and (4) whether the evidence was such that it might reasonably make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120143 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the discrepancy, were “violation[s]” of the manual and that, therefore, the presumption of validity is overcome
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210393 - 2018-03-29
the discrepancy, were “violation[s]” of the manual and that, therefore, the presumption of validity is overcome
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210393 - 2018-03-29
State v. William A.H.
County: S. MICHAEL WILK, Judge. Affirmed. SNYDER, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12891 - 2005-03-31
County: S. MICHAEL WILK, Judge. Affirmed. SNYDER, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12891 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, operator and holder of a liquor license for “R Place on Park,” located at 1821 S. Park Street in Madison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121740 - 2014-09-16
, operator and holder of a liquor license for “R Place on Park,” located at 1821 S. Park Street in Madison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121740 - 2014-09-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable and represented his will and not his judgment; and (4) whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1053789 - 2025-12-23
was arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable and represented his will and not his judgment; and (4) whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1053789 - 2025-12-23