Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39621 - 39630 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Search results 39621 - 39630 of 58506 for speedy trial.
State v. Daniel J. Frank
maintains that the trial court erred, but now concedes that his argument must be rejected by this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16243 - 2005-03-31
maintains that the trial court erred, but now concedes that his argument must be rejected by this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16243 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of facts highly relevant to the imposition of sentence, but not known to the trial judge at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94909 - 2013-04-08
of facts highly relevant to the imposition of sentence, but not known to the trial judge at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94909 - 2013-04-08
Betty Jane Maher v. Peggy Jeanne Maher and Patricia Marie Majewski
was only intended to convey one of the parcels to their stepmother. We disagree and affirm the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5395 - 2005-03-31
was only intended to convey one of the parcels to their stepmother. We disagree and affirm the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5395 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Robert L. Haack v. James Stephens
incurred while litigating a deed reformation claim against a third party, Mary Leader. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13345 - 2017-09-21
incurred while litigating a deed reformation claim against a third party, Mary Leader. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13345 - 2017-09-21
State v. Nathan Gillis
. Indeed, the plea came after several days of trial, and after the complaining witness had been subjected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8479 - 2005-03-31
. Indeed, the plea came after several days of trial, and after the complaining witness had been subjected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8479 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David B. Mattson
of § 161.41(3r), STATS., 1993-94.3 He claims the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12475 - 2017-09-21
of § 161.41(3r), STATS., 1993-94.3 He claims the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12475 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Because we conclude the motion was procedurally barred, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104696 - 2013-11-25
of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Because we conclude the motion was procedurally barred, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104696 - 2013-11-25
State v. David B. Mattson
of § 161.41(3r), Stats., 1993-94.[3] He claims the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12475 - 2005-03-31
of § 161.41(3r), Stats., 1993-94.[3] He claims the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12475 - 2005-03-31
Peter Dregne v. West Bend Mutual Insurance Company
of Appeals District IV 119 Martin Luther King Blvd. Madison, WI 53703 Hon. Michael J. Byron Trial Court
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12437 - 2005-03-31
of Appeals District IV 119 Martin Luther King Blvd. Madison, WI 53703 Hon. Michael J. Byron Trial Court
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12437 - 2005-03-31
John C. Koshick v. State
the trial court erred by dismissing the complaint with prejudice. Koshick asserts he received no notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3241 - 2005-03-31
the trial court erred by dismissing the complaint with prejudice. Koshick asserts he received no notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3241 - 2005-03-31