Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39631 - 39640 of 64113 for records/1000.
Search results 39631 - 39640 of 64113 for records/1000.
State v. Latasha J.
The court record clearly shows that Latasha was provided with sufficient and repeated warnings that her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6058 - 2005-03-31
The court record clearly shows that Latasha was provided with sufficient and repeated warnings that her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6058 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
misrepresents the record. ETA’s letter brief explicitly requested that the court not issue a stay. Aside from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104447 - 2013-11-18
misrepresents the record. ETA’s letter brief explicitly requested that the court not issue a stay. Aside from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104447 - 2013-11-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for the court’s exercise of discretion in accordance with accepted legal standards and the facts of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158340 - 2017-09-21
for the court’s exercise of discretion in accordance with accepted legal standards and the facts of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158340 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
determination is supported by the record of the sentencing proceeding. That record is silent on the issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87179 - 2012-09-17
determination is supported by the record of the sentencing proceeding. That record is silent on the issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87179 - 2012-09-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
exercises discretion when it considers the facts of record under the proper legal standard and reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80439 - 2014-09-15
exercises discretion when it considers the facts of record under the proper legal standard and reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80439 - 2014-09-15
James D. Luedtke v. David H. Schwarz
the consequences of failing to timely hold his revocation hearing. More importantly, the record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10070 - 2005-03-31
the consequences of failing to timely hold his revocation hearing. More importantly, the record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10070 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, with the possible exception of the forgiveness of the interest under the will.[2] The only evidence in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29704 - 2007-07-16
, with the possible exception of the forgiveness of the interest under the will.[2] The only evidence in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29704 - 2007-07-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191299 - 2017-09-21
record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191299 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, we search the record for evidence to support findings reached by the trial court, not findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32506 - 2008-04-22
, we search the record for evidence to support findings reached by the trial court, not findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32506 - 2008-04-22
Lorraine Schram v. Barbara F. Adams
, in effect, that where a piece of land is subdivided into lots, and a plat of the subdivision [is] recorded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12907 - 2005-03-31
, in effect, that where a piece of land is subdivided into lots, and a plat of the subdivision [is] recorded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12907 - 2005-03-31