Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39641 - 39650 of 68246 for law.

[PDF] Alyson Marklein v. Horizon Investments
had failed to show that it complied with the law in withholding their security deposit. Horizon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13339 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of facts supports a constitutionally permissible search presents a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210908 - 2018-04-10

[PDF] State v. Mack McClinton
voluntarily consented to a warrantless search presents mixed questions of constitutional fact and law. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14222 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. William F. Jorgensen
assistance of counsel claim presents mixed questions of law and fact. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6647 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
support a determination that Nora’s testimony was incredible as a matter of law. See Poellinger, 153
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=550992 - 2022-08-02

Banks Bros. Corporation v. Donovan Floors, Inc.
on undisputed facts is question of law subject to de novo review). We apply statutes to give effect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16258 - 2007-02-26

State v. Jason J.C.
. The question of giving a statute retroactive application is one of law which we decide ab initio, without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12425 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
by the evidence and is inconsistent with Wisconsin foreclosure law. We are not persuaded. The court determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102087 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Helen E. Cook v. Thomas V. Rankin, M.D.
and law. Peplinski v. Fobe’s Roofing, Inc., 193 Wis. 2d 6, 19, 531 N.W.2d 597 (1995). Thus, we must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5202 - 2017-09-19

City of Milwaukee v. Roadster LLC
with the operation of its business. ¶2 Coakley claims the trial court erred as a matter of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5904 - 2006-02-06