Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39651 - 39660 of 58285 for speedy trial.
Search results 39651 - 39660 of 58285 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
prior to the scheduled trial date. Colten appeared at trial pro se, purporting to represent Historic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81888 - 2012-05-02
prior to the scheduled trial date. Colten appeared at trial pro se, purporting to represent Historic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81888 - 2012-05-02
[PDF]
State v. Allan Biesterveld
1 The defendant also contends that the trial court relied on inaccurate information
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26272 - 2017-09-21
1 The defendant also contends that the trial court relied on inaccurate information
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26272 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. James C. Smith
two psychologists at trial. First, Dr. Anthony Jurek testified that Smith suffered from paraphilia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6661 - 2017-09-20
two psychologists at trial. First, Dr. Anthony Jurek testified that Smith suffered from paraphilia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6661 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
circumstances. Id. “The purpose of the permissive joinder statute is to avoid multiple trials involving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218504 - 2018-09-05
circumstances. Id. “The purpose of the permissive joinder statute is to avoid multiple trials involving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218504 - 2018-09-05
[PDF]
State v. Darrin D. Grosskopf
trial under WIS. STAT. § 805.15(1) (2001-02) 1 on the ground that the real controversy was not fully
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6184 - 2017-09-19
trial under WIS. STAT. § 805.15(1) (2001-02) 1 on the ground that the real controversy was not fully
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6184 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
further challenges the trial court’s decision to rescind an order for an interpreter during the pendency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82287 - 2014-09-15
further challenges the trial court’s decision to rescind an order for an interpreter during the pendency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82287 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
in other case files were dismissed as read-ins at sentencing. The trial court sentenced him to seven years
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132561 - 2015-01-06
in other case files were dismissed as read-ins at sentencing. The trial court sentenced him to seven years
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132561 - 2015-01-06
COURT OF APPEALS
commissioner dismissed her claims, Adama requested a bench trial. Following this trial, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49412 - 2010-04-28
commissioner dismissed her claims, Adama requested a bench trial. Following this trial, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49412 - 2010-04-28
CA Blank Order
evidence that would have been excluded had there been a trial, a sentencing court may consider uncharged
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103691 - 2013-11-04
evidence that would have been excluded had there been a trial, a sentencing court may consider uncharged
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103691 - 2013-11-04
State v. Doran J. London
consecutively. On July 19, 1993, both London and his trial counsel signed a “Rights to Appeal” form stating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11633 - 2005-03-31
consecutively. On July 19, 1993, both London and his trial counsel signed a “Rights to Appeal” form stating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11633 - 2005-03-31