Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39661 - 39670 of 76965 for judgment for u s.
Search results 39661 - 39670 of 76965 for judgment for u s.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2020CV6800 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I MICHAEL S. PEDEN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=771082 - 2024-03-05
. No. 2020CV6800 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I MICHAEL S. PEDEN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=771082 - 2024-03-05
COURT OF APPEALS
State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Michael S. Danforth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32006 - 2008-03-05
State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Michael S. Danforth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32006 - 2008-03-05
[PDF]
Brenda L. Lenzner v. Timothy J. Lenzner
court’s order. ¶2 Timothy is self-employed at ACR Universal, a small trucking business. ACR is an S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25342 - 2017-09-21
court’s order. ¶2 Timothy is self-employed at ACR Universal, a small trucking business. ACR is an S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25342 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. George Schertz
the same analysis. ¶9 To begin, we attempt to discern WIS. STAT. § 971.17’s objective. In R.R.E
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5073 - 2017-09-19
the same analysis. ¶9 To begin, we attempt to discern WIS. STAT. § 971.17’s objective. In R.R.E
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5073 - 2017-09-19
State v. Eugene E.
., does not require the [S]tate to present evidence on all the listed waiver criteria, noting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13179 - 2005-03-31
., does not require the [S]tate to present evidence on all the listed waiver criteria, noting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13179 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
sentence based on Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48 (2010), and Miller v. Alabama, ___ U.S. ___, 132 S. Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118824 - 2014-09-15
sentence based on Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48 (2010), and Miller v. Alabama, ___ U.S. ___, 132 S. Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118824 - 2014-09-15
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
. 06-01-2011 Affirmed 2010AP001669 State v. Anthony M. S
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69447 - 2011-08-08
. 06-01-2011 Affirmed 2010AP001669 State v. Anthony M. S
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69447 - 2011-08-08
State v. Diane F.
considerations. In making a decision about the appropriate disposition under s. 48.427, the court shall consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7075 - 2005-03-31
considerations. In making a decision about the appropriate disposition under s. 48.427, the court shall consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7075 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dorian H.
the case in juvenile court. The record before the court details Dorian H.'s gang
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9278 - 2005-03-31
the case in juvenile court. The record before the court details Dorian H.'s gang
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9278 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
commission’s conclusion that, “as an untreated sex offender, [he] pose[s] an unreasonable risk to the public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99252 - 2013-07-15
commission’s conclusion that, “as an untreated sex offender, [he] pose[s] an unreasonable risk to the public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99252 - 2013-07-15