Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39661 - 39670 of 82541 for order for a biological sample for drug testing.
Search results 39661 - 39670 of 82541 for order for a biological sample for drug testing.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
notified that the Court has entered the following opinion and order: 2025AP398 State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1098451 - 2026-04-01
notified that the Court has entered the following opinion and order: 2025AP398 State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1098451 - 2026-04-01
State v. Giles L. Smith
-Appellant. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Eau Claire County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15160 - 2005-03-31
-Appellant. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Eau Claire County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15160 - 2005-03-31
2007 WI APP 196
, Respondents-Respondents. APPEAL from an order and a judgment of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29561 - 2007-08-27
, Respondents-Respondents. APPEAL from an order and a judgment of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29561 - 2007-08-27
[PDF]
Darrell Harding v. Parmod Kumar
, and these revolve around an order for judgment dated October 22, 1998, two judgments dated December 1, 1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15822 - 2017-09-21
, and these revolve around an order for judgment dated October 22, 1998, two judgments dated December 1, 1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15822 - 2017-09-21
Darrell Harding v. Parmod Kumar
jurisdiction, and these revolve around an order for judgment dated October 22, 1998, two judgments dated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15822 - 2005-03-31
jurisdiction, and these revolve around an order for judgment dated October 22, 1998, two judgments dated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15822 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
suspicion is a common sense test: under all the facts and circumstances present, what would a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74818 - 2014-09-15
suspicion is a common sense test: under all the facts and circumstances present, what would a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74818 - 2014-09-15
State v. Gregory C. Kirst
. The test for sufficiency of evidence is whether a reasonable trier of fact could be convinced of guilt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9066 - 2005-03-31
. The test for sufficiency of evidence is whether a reasonable trier of fact could be convinced of guilt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9066 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2013AP130-CR 4 745 N.W.2d 397. The test for harmless error is “whether there is a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103997 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2013AP130-CR 4 745 N.W.2d 397. The test for harmless error is “whether there is a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103997 - 2017-09-21
Debbra MacDonald v. American National Property and Casualty Company
). In applying the test, the fact-finder considers: “(1) age of the person; (2) whether a separate residence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5006 - 2005-03-31
). In applying the test, the fact-finder considers: “(1) age of the person; (2) whether a separate residence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5006 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
near plaintiff’s property.” We review circuit court findings under the “clearly erroneous” test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27363 - 2014-09-15
near plaintiff’s property.” We review circuit court findings under the “clearly erroneous” test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27363 - 2014-09-15