Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39661 - 39670 of 46060 for paternity test paper work.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
cause exists depends upon a common- sense test and is determined based on the totality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138312 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Raphael C. Calhoun
. 1 The “corner cut” field-tested positive for cocaine base. No. 00-2428-CR 3 ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2999 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. Poellinger, 153 Wis. 2d 493, 501, 451 N.W.2d 752 (1990). The test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29015 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
showing as to one prong of the test, we need not address the other. Id. at 697. ¶14 A claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=961448 - 2025-05-28

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Assistance of Counsel A. Standard of Review ¶11 The test for ineffective assistance of counsel is two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91549 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI APP 272
of officers involved.” Id. ¶18 This test is not, however, a matter of simply determining how many
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30851 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
in the belief that a suspect may be armed. See Kyles, 269 Wis. 2d 1, ¶10. We employ an objective test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30846 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
need not—and do not—address those issues. See Industrial Risk Insurers v. American Eng’g Testing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=454776 - 2021-11-23

[PDF] NOTICE
,” and not as discrete elements of a more rigid test: “[A] deficiency in one [consideration] may be compensated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34500 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
apply two tests, one subjective and one objective. State v. Rochelt, 165 Wis. 2d 373, 378, 477 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89358 - 2014-09-15