Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39671 - 39680 of 83322 for case search.
Search results 39671 - 39680 of 83322 for case search.
[PDF]
State v. Kevin L. Guibord
from the case when Guibord indicated he did not want to be represented by counsel. 2 The facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14230 - 2014-09-15
from the case when Guibord indicated he did not want to be represented by counsel. 2 The facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14230 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on July 31, 2020, and ordered $250 cash bond on this case. Monge posted bond that same day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=819266 - 2024-07-03
on July 31, 2020, and ordered $250 cash bond on this case. Monge posted bond that same day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=819266 - 2024-07-03
State v. Jeffrey C. Miller
judge in an aggravated case and in the exercise of proper discretion could impose a maximum sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12001 - 2005-03-31
judge in an aggravated case and in the exercise of proper discretion could impose a maximum sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12001 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneously denied his motion to dismiss the case on double jeopardy grounds. We disagree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35622 - 2009-02-23
erroneously denied his motion to dismiss the case on double jeopardy grounds. We disagree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35622 - 2009-02-23
[PDF]
Robert Robinson v. City of Milwaukee
with any case law, statute, or administrative code that would lend authority to his assertions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7343 - 2017-09-20
with any case law, statute, or administrative code that would lend authority to his assertions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7343 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2017AP1389 2 and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213397 - 2018-05-30
. No. 2017AP1389 2 and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213397 - 2018-05-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
appropriate. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100891 - 2017-09-21
appropriate. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100891 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Village of Germantown v. Frederick A. Wittenberger
on the comparison of the facts in Wittenberger’s case to those in Quelle. Although in Quelle the waiver rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7599 - 2017-09-19
on the comparison of the facts in Wittenberger’s case to those in Quelle. Although in Quelle the waiver rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7599 - 2017-09-19
State v. Wilbert L. Thomas
not done so. To decide this case we must examine § 980.02, Stats., to see which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13530 - 2005-03-31
not done so. To decide this case we must examine § 980.02, Stats., to see which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13530 - 2005-03-31
State v. Arthur J. McCoy
on his case. According to McCoy, the juror was standing in the doorway of the courtroom while McCoy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16302 - 2005-03-31
on his case. According to McCoy, the juror was standing in the doorway of the courtroom while McCoy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16302 - 2005-03-31