Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39671 - 39680 of 83344 for case search.

Lawrence H. DeClerc v. Bellin Memorial Hospital
elements of the plaintiff's case against the transport company were determined in its favor by five-sixths
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14793 - 2005-03-31

City of Menasha Public Works v. Kristin J. Erickson
insurer, LIRC reopened the first case based on the newly discovered evidence that Erickson's ankle had
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10677 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] 97 CV 415J Anthony D. Taylor v. Rock County Sheriff's Department
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-2248 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14349 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Robert Robinson v. City of Milwaukee
with any case law, statute, or administrative code that would lend authority to his assertions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7343 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134107 - 2017-09-21

State v. John Grover
the case to the trial court for entry of the proper judgment or for a new trial …. We exercise our power
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18178 - 2005-05-16

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=126146 - 2017-09-21

CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134107 - 2015-01-28

[PDF] CA Blank Order
does not support the proposition for which the tenants cite it. On the contrary, in that case, our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1062513 - 2026-01-15

COURT OF APPEALS
erroneously denied his motion to dismiss the case on double jeopardy grounds. We disagree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35622 - 2009-02-23