Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39671 - 39680 of 58285 for speedy trial.
Search results 39671 - 39680 of 58285 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Karl Meyer
the application of the statute to undisputed facts, this court reviews the trial court’s order de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10583 - 2017-09-20
the application of the statute to undisputed facts, this court reviews the trial court’s order de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10583 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
commissioner dismissed her claims, Adama requested a bench trial. Following this trial, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49412 - 2010-04-28
commissioner dismissed her claims, Adama requested a bench trial. Following this trial, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49412 - 2010-04-28
CA Blank Order
evidence that would have been excluded had there been a trial, a sentencing court may consider uncharged
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103691 - 2013-11-04
evidence that would have been excluded had there been a trial, a sentencing court may consider uncharged
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103691 - 2013-11-04
State v. Doran J. London
consecutively. On July 19, 1993, both London and his trial counsel signed a “Rights to Appeal” form stating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11633 - 2005-03-31
consecutively. On July 19, 1993, both London and his trial counsel signed a “Rights to Appeal” form stating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11633 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mark S. Witkowski
appendix providing relevant docket entries in the trial court, the findings or opinion of the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8641 - 2005-03-31
appendix providing relevant docket entries in the trial court, the findings or opinion of the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8641 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to Davis’s competency to stand trial and her motion for reverse waiver to the juvenile court, the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164157 - 2017-09-21
to Davis’s competency to stand trial and her motion for reverse waiver to the juvenile court, the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164157 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-Jimenez was convicted of first-degree intentional homicide following a jury trial, and sentenced to life
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=646776 - 2023-04-20
-Jimenez was convicted of first-degree intentional homicide following a jury trial, and sentenced to life
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=646776 - 2023-04-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not violated and that the trial court properly exercised its discretion in not granting him an evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252390 - 2020-01-15
not violated and that the trial court properly exercised its discretion in not granting him an evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252390 - 2020-01-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
hearing. At that time, trial counsel could not provide credit information due to uncertainty about
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=421269 - 2021-09-08
hearing. At that time, trial counsel could not provide credit information due to uncertainty about
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=421269 - 2021-09-08
[PDF]
State v. Robert T. Barnard
of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated, fourth offense. Barnard argues the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7451 - 2017-09-20
of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated, fourth offense. Barnard argues the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7451 - 2017-09-20