Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39681 - 39690 of 68969 for had.

[PDF] State v. Aaron K. Gibbs
be vacated and the petition dismissed. We disagree. We hold that the circuit court had the authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2556 - 2017-09-19

WI App 119 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP2076 Complete Title o...
of the land. The Wieds answered with both an affirmative defense and a counterclaim asserting they had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67352 - 2011-08-29

Oakdale Company v. Quadra Incorporated
December 1998. Quadra had already vacated the premises. Since the 1998 taxes were not levied during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2448 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
and books which had caused damage to carpeting and other surrounding items. Because Thor was identified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33824 - 2014-09-15

State v. Nathaniel Whaley
it improperly handled the remand directions from this court and he contends that had the trial court complied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10113 - 2005-03-31

State v. Henry T. Skibinski
] had been sentenced on it.” ¶8 The trial court’s interpretation is flawed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2592 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of the homestead that the couple had owned during their lives as survivorship marital property (“the North
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1056714 - 2025-12-30

WI App 125 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP2544 Complete Title o...
therefore had no duty to indemnify or further defend Hendricks. Hendricks argues the policy does afford
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88006 - 2012-11-28

[PDF] John P. Pappas v. Angeline Pappas Petros
and abutting property owners had a right No. 02-0202 7 to use the alley, and the alley had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4861 - 2017-09-19

State v. William D. Olson
was not an improbable estimation, but an educated guess. Had the court imposed a two-year term rather than a five-year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8358 - 2005-03-31