Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39681 - 39690 of 58479 for speedy trial.

Bank of Sun Prairie v. Marshall Development Company
on another mortgage securing the same debt. The trial court concluded that under the doctrine of merger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2518 - 2005-03-31

State v. Rache M.
] Rache entered the plea after the trial court denied his suppression motion. Rache's appeal presents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8947 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jimmy A. Carter
. A leading case on the constitutional limits to a trial court’s powers on resentencing is North Carolina v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16929 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] The Third Branch, fall 2005
– possibly longer than Wisconsin has existed. The counties provided funding for the trial courts
/news/thirdbranch/docs/fall05.pdf - 2009-12-02

[PDF] State v. David L. Geyer
for the trial court to conclude there was probable cause to arrest because the field sobriety tests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14939 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
] Brittany L. Roe appeals the trial court’s order finding that she improperly refused to take a breathalyzer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32804 - 2008-05-27

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is made, the trial judge should inquire whether there are proper reasons for substitution.” Id., ¶66
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248157 - 2019-10-08

[PDF] State v. Frank J. Endres
that the administration of the Informing the Accused form did not comply with § 343.503(4), STATS. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14962 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Douglas County Department of Human Services v. Susan L.
. The trial court’s duty to warn and inform the parent under § 48.356(2) is included in the “'panoply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12882 - 2017-09-21

State v. Julie A. Williams
an investigatory stop. We agree with the trial court and affirm both the order denying the suppression motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5625 - 2005-03-31