Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3971 - 3980 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 3971 - 3980 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
State v. Keith M. Carey
. The State appeals from an order denying its motion for redetermination of Keith M. Carey’s competency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6587 - 2005-03-31
. The State appeals from an order denying its motion for redetermination of Keith M. Carey’s competency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6587 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
was the minimum amount of custody necessary to achieve the sentencing considerations (“minimum custody standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33761 - 2008-08-18
was the minimum amount of custody necessary to achieve the sentencing considerations (“minimum custody standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33761 - 2008-08-18
State v. Keith M. Carey
. The State appeals from an order denying its motion for redetermination of Keith M. Carey’s competency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6582 - 2005-03-31
. The State appeals from an order denying its motion for redetermination of Keith M. Carey’s competency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6582 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
the confinement term was the minimum amount of custody necessary to achieve the sentencing considerations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33761 - 2014-09-15
the confinement term was the minimum amount of custody necessary to achieve the sentencing considerations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33761 - 2014-09-15
State v. Keith M. Carey
. The State appeals from an order denying its motion for redetermination of Keith M. Carey’s competency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6586 - 2005-03-31
. The State appeals from an order denying its motion for redetermination of Keith M. Carey’s competency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6586 - 2005-03-31
State v. Keith M. Carey
. The State appeals from an order denying its motion for redetermination of Keith M. Carey’s competency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6583 - 2005-03-31
. The State appeals from an order denying its motion for redetermination of Keith M. Carey’s competency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6583 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI App 61
the statements he made at the scene of his arrest. 3 Wortman claimed that he was in custody beginning when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194977 - 2017-10-09
the statements he made at the scene of his arrest. 3 Wortman claimed that he was in custody beginning when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194977 - 2017-10-09
State v. Roy L. Rogers
his guilty plea, and from the trial court order denying his motion for postconviction relief, and from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13218 - 2005-03-31
his guilty plea, and from the trial court order denying his motion for postconviction relief, and from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13218 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Roy L. Rogers
and the September 17, 1997 order denying the motion for postconviction relief. The Honorable Thomas P. Donegan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13218 - 2017-09-21
and the September 17, 1997 order denying the motion for postconviction relief. The Honorable Thomas P. Donegan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13218 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(2019-20)1 postconviction motion for a new trial and postconviction discovery, entered following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=441044 - 2021-10-14
(2019-20)1 postconviction motion for a new trial and postconviction discovery, entered following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=441044 - 2021-10-14