Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3971 - 3980 of 29740 for des.
Search results 3971 - 3980 of 29740 for des.
State v. Mark Sevelin
. Statutory interpretation is a question of law we review de novo. State ex rel. Frederick v. McCaughtry, 173
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10531 - 2005-03-31
. Statutory interpretation is a question of law we review de novo. State ex rel. Frederick v. McCaughtry, 173
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10531 - 2005-03-31
Village of Slinger v. City of Hartford
relief is a question of law we review de novo. Town of Eagle v. Christensen, 191 Wis. 2d 301, 315, 529
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4671 - 2005-03-31
relief is a question of law we review de novo. Town of Eagle v. Christensen, 191 Wis. 2d 301, 315, 529
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4671 - 2005-03-31
Travelers Indemnity Company of Illinois v. Staff Right, Inc.
Insurance. II. ¶8 Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21745 - 2006-04-25
Insurance. II. ¶8 Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21745 - 2006-04-25
09AP2841 State v. Michael S. Miske
is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Waldner, 206 Wis. 2d 51, 54, 556 N.W.2d 681 (1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49956 - 2010-05-18
is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Waldner, 206 Wis. 2d 51, 54, 556 N.W.2d 681 (1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49956 - 2010-05-18
Steven H. Hoyme v. Janice S. Brakken
requested a de novo hearing before the circuit court. The evening before the hearing, the parties discussed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5444 - 2005-03-31
requested a de novo hearing before the circuit court. The evening before the hearing, the parties discussed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5444 - 2005-03-31
2006 WI APP 239
of fact under the clearly erroneous standard, but applying constitutional standards to those facts de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26859 - 2006-11-20
of fact under the clearly erroneous standard, but applying constitutional standards to those facts de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26859 - 2006-11-20
COURT OF APPEALS
Development Authority, Domonic R. D'Acquisto, Mark A. Slocomb, David L. De Angelis and John R. Johnson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121803 - 2014-09-16
Development Authority, Domonic R. D'Acquisto, Mark A. Slocomb, David L. De Angelis and John R. Johnson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121803 - 2014-09-16
WI App 33 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2014AP1092 Complete Title of...
of private property without just compensation is a question of law that [we] review[] de novo.” Id., ¶35
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138279 - 2015-04-28
of private property without just compensation is a question of law that [we] review[] de novo.” Id., ¶35
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138279 - 2015-04-28
COURT OF APPEALS
: Robert p. van de hey, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 HIGGINBOTHAM, J.[1] Samuel R. Anderson appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96839 - 2013-05-15
: Robert p. van de hey, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 HIGGINBOTHAM, J.[1] Samuel R. Anderson appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96839 - 2013-05-15
COURT OF APPEALS
the same methodology as the circuit court, and we consider the issues de novo. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73057 - 2011-11-02
the same methodology as the circuit court, and we consider the issues de novo. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73057 - 2011-11-02