Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3971 - 3980 of 63537 for records.
Search results 3971 - 3980 of 63537 for records.
Wisconsin Court System - Office of Lawyer Regulation Procedure Review Committee
Conference Planning Committee Judicial Education Committee Records & technology Consolidated Court Automation
/courts/committees/procrev.htm - 2026-02-22
Conference Planning Committee Judicial Education Committee Records & technology Consolidated Court Automation
/courts/committees/procrev.htm - 2026-02-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
both counsel’s report and Davis’s response, and upon our independent review of the record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39496 - 2014-09-15
both counsel’s report and Davis’s response, and upon our independent review of the record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39496 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Michael J. Kidd
, for a waiver of the right to counsel to be valid, “the record must reflect” that the defendant: (1) made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4986 - 2017-09-19
, for a waiver of the right to counsel to be valid, “the record must reflect” that the defendant: (1) made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4986 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Koua v.
jurisdiction. A juvenile judge is to state his or her finding with respect to the criteria on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9569 - 2017-09-19
jurisdiction. A juvenile judge is to state his or her finding with respect to the criteria on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9569 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
the record and the no-merit report, this court concludes there are no arguably meritorious issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96346 - 2013-04-30
the record and the no-merit report, this court concludes there are no arguably meritorious issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96346 - 2013-04-30
[PDF]
NOTICE
order “for the reasons set forth on the record at the time of the hearing.” Driessen now appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61402 - 2014-09-15
order “for the reasons set forth on the record at the time of the hearing.” Driessen now appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61402 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of counsel. Upon our review of the record, no-merit report, and response, we agree with counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96145 - 2014-09-15
of counsel. Upon our review of the record, no-merit report, and response, we agree with counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96145 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
is not in the record, but is undisputed between the parties. No. 2008AP1974 3 ¶4 On March 24, 2008
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34800 - 2014-09-15
is not in the record, but is undisputed between the parties. No. 2008AP1974 3 ¶4 On March 24, 2008
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34800 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
on these principles, nor is DHS’s request apparent from the record.[4] Because we do not know what DHS requested from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34800 - 2008-12-03
on these principles, nor is DHS’s request apparent from the record.[4] Because we do not know what DHS requested from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34800 - 2008-12-03
Philip Anderson v. Judith Leamy
they are unsupported by the record and are, therefore, clearly erroneous. Section 805.17(2), Stats. We search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14536 - 2005-03-31
they are unsupported by the record and are, therefore, clearly erroneous. Section 805.17(2), Stats. We search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14536 - 2005-03-31