Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3971 - 3980 of 63537 for records.
Search results 3971 - 3980 of 63537 for records.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to a new trial because the circuit court allowed him to proceed pro se when the record does not show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=372454 - 2021-06-02
to a new trial because the circuit court allowed him to proceed pro se when the record does not show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=372454 - 2021-06-02
COURT OF APPEALS
of a new factor, much less by clear and convincing evidence. Indeed, the record belies Nelson’s assertions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93708 - 2013-03-04
of a new factor, much less by clear and convincing evidence. Indeed, the record belies Nelson’s assertions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93708 - 2013-03-04
[PDF]
NOTICE
both counsel’s report and Davis’s response, and upon our independent review of the record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39496 - 2014-09-15
both counsel’s report and Davis’s response, and upon our independent review of the record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39496 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Michael J. Kidd
, for a waiver of the right to counsel to be valid, “the record must reflect” that the defendant: (1) made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4986 - 2017-09-19
, for a waiver of the right to counsel to be valid, “the record must reflect” that the defendant: (1) made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4986 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Koua v.
jurisdiction. A juvenile judge is to state his or her finding with respect to the criteria on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9569 - 2017-09-19
jurisdiction. A juvenile judge is to state his or her finding with respect to the criteria on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9569 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
order “for the reasons set forth on the record at the time of the hearing.” Driessen now appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61402 - 2014-09-15
order “for the reasons set forth on the record at the time of the hearing.” Driessen now appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61402 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
on these principles, nor is DHS’s request apparent from the record.[4] Because we do not know what DHS requested from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34800 - 2008-12-03
on these principles, nor is DHS’s request apparent from the record.[4] Because we do not know what DHS requested from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34800 - 2008-12-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146155 - 2017-09-21
not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146155 - 2017-09-21
State v. John H. H., Jr.
that are unsupported by proper citation to legal and record authority. Because John H. H., Jr.’s briefs do not meet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21718 - 2006-03-14
that are unsupported by proper citation to legal and record authority. Because John H. H., Jr.’s briefs do not meet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21718 - 2006-03-14
State v. Jean H.
to the record, the trial date of February 1, 1999, was selected on August 12, 1998.[4] The petition had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15634 - 2005-03-31
to the record, the trial date of February 1, 1999, was selected on August 12, 1998.[4] The petition had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15634 - 2005-03-31