Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3971 - 3980 of 20373 for sai.

State v. Daniel R. F.
in this particular case that we have in front of us. That deals with a case where you have an Information that says
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3235 - 2005-03-31

State v. Craig M.E.
clear to her that Craig understood what she was saying about the consequences of disclosure. Bard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2741 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 124
a choice in the matter and he could say “no.” Finally, the court chose to believe the officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28363 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the hearing but does not say what evidence or witnesses he might have produced had the allegations been more
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220077 - 2018-10-03

[PDF] NOTICE
trusted Reif and knew what Reif expected her to say. Thus, the videotaped statement was admissible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26726 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the price is. I will say that this is a case where I could impose up to 65 years in prison. And some
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112088 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Timothy D. Kingstad
on the criminal complaint: The State of Wisconsin says that between the approximate dates of March 11, 95
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12841 - 2017-09-21

WI App 83 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP897 Complete Title o...
of the benefits must be “certain.” Id. (citations omitted). That is to say, the benefit must not be contingent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63792 - 2011-06-28

Individual Subpoenaed to Appear at Waukesha County John Doe Case No. 2003 JD 001 v. J. Mac Davis
oath, saying, "So help me God." The Witness then signed a copy of the oath. Judge Davis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18502 - 2005-06-08

Ellen C. Voie v. Thomas M. Pliska
from her. The court ruled in Thomas’s favor, saying, “I think that the length of the marriage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5733 - 2005-03-31