Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39711 - 39720 of 83831 for simple case search.
Search results 39711 - 39720 of 83831 for simple case search.
[PDF]
State v. Michael G.
in this case is transparent and puerile. We also caution counsel that recitation of “facts” without citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12566 - 2017-09-21
in this case is transparent and puerile. We also caution counsel that recitation of “facts” without citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12566 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
seven hours for the sole purpose of extracting a confession to ‘sew up’ the case against him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54140 - 2014-09-15
seven hours for the sole purpose of extracting a confession to ‘sew up’ the case against him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54140 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
claim’s viability. We agree. We reverse the judgment and remand this case for further proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32731 - 2014-09-15
claim’s viability. We agree. We reverse the judgment and remand this case for further proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32731 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Brad E. Glaunert
. ¶12 The matter proceeded to a two-day jury trial in June 2002. At the close of the State’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5873 - 2017-09-19
. ¶12 The matter proceeded to a two-day jury trial in June 2002. At the close of the State’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5873 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Brandy Albert Essex
in this case violates § 973.15(2)(a) because it could run consecutive to future sentences. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7393 - 2017-09-20
in this case violates § 973.15(2)(a) because it could run consecutive to future sentences. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7393 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
what a reasonable officer could infer from this response. ¶6 To begin, the cases cited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264840 - 2020-06-18
what a reasonable officer could infer from this response. ¶6 To begin, the cases cited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264840 - 2020-06-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
at 702. ¶4 When the case was returned, the circuit court asked the parties to brief arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49969 - 2014-09-15
at 702. ¶4 When the case was returned, the circuit court asked the parties to brief arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49969 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Rebecca J. Atwood v. Robert E. Atwood
, used for pre-retirement personal objectives. Robert argues that the court erred because cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12927 - 2017-09-21
, used for pre-retirement personal objectives. Robert argues that the court erred because cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12927 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Lynn Morrissey
2005 WI 2 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 04-1869-D COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16836 - 2017-09-21
2005 WI 2 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 04-1869-D COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16836 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
of these No. 2009AP436-CR 4 secondary factors, but rather only those relevant to the particular case. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45860 - 2014-09-15
of these No. 2009AP436-CR 4 secondary factors, but rather only those relevant to the particular case. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45860 - 2014-09-15