Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39711 - 39720 of 58458 for speedy trial.
Search results 39711 - 39720 of 58458 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Ryan Ross
. § 961.41(3g)(e). 2 Ross contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress. 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4079 - 2017-09-20
. § 961.41(3g)(e). 2 Ross contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress. 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4079 - 2017-09-20
CA Blank Order
evidence that would have been excluded had there been a trial, a sentencing court may consider uncharged
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103691 - 2013-11-04
evidence that would have been excluded had there been a trial, a sentencing court may consider uncharged
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103691 - 2013-11-04
CA Blank Order
proceedings, the argument would probably have to be that trial counsel was ineffective by failing to obtain
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107363 - 2014-01-22
proceedings, the argument would probably have to be that trial counsel was ineffective by failing to obtain
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107363 - 2014-01-22
CA Blank Order
203, 752 N.W.2d 393 (“[I]n exercising discretion, the trial court must do something more than … impos
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101587 - 2013-09-03
203, 752 N.W.2d 393 (“[I]n exercising discretion, the trial court must do something more than … impos
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101587 - 2013-09-03
Century 21 Gold Award Homes v. Steve Camden
for their commission. The parties moved for summary judgment. The trial court granted the realtors’ summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12938 - 2005-03-31
for their commission. The parties moved for summary judgment. The trial court granted the realtors’ summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12938 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jacob W. Hatcher
and, accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s judgment and order. Background ¶2 The facts of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5746 - 2005-03-31
and, accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s judgment and order. Background ¶2 The facts of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5746 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and that trial and postconviction counsel were ineffective for failing to raise that claim. The circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=466472 - 2021-12-29
and that trial and postconviction counsel were ineffective for failing to raise that claim. The circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=466472 - 2021-12-29
[PDF]
State v. Thomas M. Fischer
to answer constituted an unreasonable refusal, we affirm the trial court’s judgment. No. 98-2572
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14460 - 2017-09-21
to answer constituted an unreasonable refusal, we affirm the trial court’s judgment. No. 98-2572
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14460 - 2017-09-21
State v. Theresa M. Sobacki
Protection Cause. The trial court decided that § 346.61 does not violate the Equal Protection Clause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16025 - 2005-03-31
Protection Cause. The trial court decided that § 346.61 does not violate the Equal Protection Clause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16025 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James G. Geiger
and claims the trial court erred in allowing an expert witness to read and summarize for the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7039 - 2017-09-20
and claims the trial court erred in allowing an expert witness to read and summarize for the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7039 - 2017-09-20