Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39741 - 39750 of 84003 for simple case search.
Search results 39741 - 39750 of 84003 for simple case search.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
remedy appropriate to the needs of the particular case, the court’s discretion is nearly unlimited. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98455 - 2014-09-15
remedy appropriate to the needs of the particular case, the court’s discretion is nearly unlimited. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98455 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. In addition, because Rodriguez-Faustino has cited no case law supporting his novel theory that a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97429 - 2013-05-30
. In addition, because Rodriguez-Faustino has cited no case law supporting his novel theory that a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97429 - 2013-05-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
., ¶¶13-14 (concluding that a case was moot when the order appealed from was expired
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=844361 - 2024-09-04
., ¶¶13-14 (concluding that a case was moot when the order appealed from was expired
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=844361 - 2024-09-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, obsolete, or inapt case law.” ¶11 We agree with the insurers that this issue is resolved based on two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170438 - 2017-09-21
, obsolete, or inapt case law.” ¶11 We agree with the insurers that this issue is resolved based on two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170438 - 2017-09-21
State v. Mark H. Price
or her impartiality. See id. In this case, however, the trial judge determined that he was impartial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10367 - 2005-03-31
or her impartiality. See id. In this case, however, the trial judge determined that he was impartial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10367 - 2005-03-31
State v. Saul R. Lopez
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8091 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8091 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ernest J.P., Jr.
has misinterpreted the statute, which does not purport to dictate how the county must prove its case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7128 - 2005-03-31
has misinterpreted the statute, which does not purport to dictate how the county must prove its case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7128 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and summarily affirm. Nos. 2012AP2221-CRNM, 2012AP2222-CRNM 2 A criminal complaint in case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100154 - 2017-09-21
and summarily affirm. Nos. 2012AP2221-CRNM, 2012AP2222-CRNM 2 A criminal complaint in case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100154 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Henry A. Phillips
convictions. This court concludes No. 98-1056-CR 2 that under the circumstances in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13887 - 2014-09-15
convictions. This court concludes No. 98-1056-CR 2 that under the circumstances in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13887 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
cases that were handled together pursuant to a joint plea agreement. We affirm for the reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30817 - 2014-09-15
cases that were handled together pursuant to a joint plea agreement. We affirm for the reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30817 - 2014-09-15