Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39751 - 39760 of 68274 for did.

COURT OF APPEALS
could have challenged and, in any event, Ellis did not take direct appeal from his judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48694 - 2010-04-05

COURT OF APPEALS
with deference. Id. ¶11 We are satisfied that the circuit court did not err when it denied Roman’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125231 - 2014-10-27

COURT OF APPEALS
living expenses decreased because she had chosen to sell the marital home and buy a more modest house did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94513 - 2013-03-31

State v. Melvin H. Van Zeeland
at Bruce's for a "couple of days," but Langenberg did not recall if he was told that Melvin knew that Doris
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14504 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Syed Hasan Turab
distance away. The last State's witness at trial was a Village of Fox Point police officer who did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10084 - 2017-09-19

Scott Buyeske v. Wausau Underwriters Insurance Company
policy in effect at the time of the claim did not contain a professional services exclusion to bar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4427 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
, the club did not “conduct itself as a nonprofit” in charging for picnics on its grounds. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31597 - 2008-01-22

[PDF] State v. Andre D. Mitchell
voluntary. Mitchell next argues that his trial counsel was ineffective because he did not subpoena
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12705 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] General Casualty Insurance Company v. Feuling Concrete Construction, Inc.
provisions because the claimed exclusions did not apply. Feuling also argued that coverage attached under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7860 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Brown County Department of Human Services v. Andrea M.S.
verdict, not for evidence to support a verdict that the jury could have reached but did not. Gonzalez v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7646 - 2017-09-19