Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39751 - 39760 of 57351 for id.
Search results 39751 - 39760 of 57351 for id.
COURT OF APPEALS
nevertheless examine the record to determine whether the facts support the circuit court’s decision. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98324 - 2013-06-19
nevertheless examine the record to determine whether the facts support the circuit court’s decision. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98324 - 2013-06-19
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey Townsend
the receiving state lodges a detainer with the sending state based upon an indictment or complaint. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6169 - 2017-09-19
the receiving state lodges a detainer with the sending state based upon an indictment or complaint. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6169 - 2017-09-19
Melanie Guth v. Timothy Guth
first look to the language of the statute itself. Id. If the meaning of the statute is clear on its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3846 - 2005-03-31
first look to the language of the statute itself. Id. If the meaning of the statute is clear on its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3846 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jacob D. Ward
to have acted reasonably, id., the trial court must articulate the basis of the sentence on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7473 - 2005-03-31
to have acted reasonably, id., the trial court must articulate the basis of the sentence on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7473 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of their testimony. See id. at 151-52. We review issues of law de novo. Rosplock v. Rosplock, 217 Wis. 2d 22, 32
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63393 - 2011-05-02
of their testimony. See id. at 151-52. We review issues of law de novo. Rosplock v. Rosplock, 217 Wis. 2d 22, 32
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63393 - 2011-05-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in specifying ... the conditions of the defendant’s confinement in the state prison.” Id. at 99. We reject
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1074426 - 2026-02-10
in specifying ... the conditions of the defendant’s confinement in the state prison.” Id. at 99. We reject
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1074426 - 2026-02-10
Patricia v. Rural Mutual Insurance Company
as a reasonable person in the insured's position would understand it. Id. When the policy is unambiguous, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10342 - 2005-03-31
as a reasonable person in the insured's position would understand it. Id. When the policy is unambiguous, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10342 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
possibility is a possibility which is sufficient to undermine our confidence in the outcome. See id. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30488 - 2007-10-01
possibility is a possibility which is sufficient to undermine our confidence in the outcome. See id. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30488 - 2007-10-01
[PDF]
State v. Antonio Jackson
in the outcome.’” Id. (quoting Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 694 (1984)). We need only address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18286 - 2017-09-21
in the outcome.’” Id. (quoting Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 694 (1984)). We need only address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18286 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Cindy A. Boelter v. Kay C. Bagstad
of the trial court’s competence, and we therefore decline to address it further. See id. ¶8 Bagstad next
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15611 - 2017-09-21
of the trial court’s competence, and we therefore decline to address it further. See id. ¶8 Bagstad next
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15611 - 2017-09-21