Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39751 - 39760 of 58546 for speedy trial.
Search results 39751 - 39760 of 58546 for speedy trial.
State v. Theresa M. Sobacki
Protection Cause. The trial court decided that § 346.61 does not violate the Equal Protection Clause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16025 - 2005-03-31
Protection Cause. The trial court decided that § 346.61 does not violate the Equal Protection Clause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16025 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James C. Smith
two psychologists at trial. First, Dr. Anthony Jurek testified that Smith suffered from paraphilia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6661 - 2017-09-20
two psychologists at trial. First, Dr. Anthony Jurek testified that Smith suffered from paraphilia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6661 - 2017-09-20
Co-op Credit Union v. Joel R. Bement
account. At trial, Joel Bement testified that he had experience with financing and loan agreements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5639 - 2005-03-31
account. At trial, Joel Bement testified that he had experience with financing and loan agreements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5639 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
203, 752 N.W.2d 393 (“[I]n exercising discretion, the trial court must do something more than … impos
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101587 - 2013-09-03
203, 752 N.W.2d 393 (“[I]n exercising discretion, the trial court must do something more than … impos
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101587 - 2013-09-03
[PDF]
State v. Ralph E. Peat
. We review facts found by the trial court to determine whether they are clearly erroneous. Section
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13141 - 2017-09-21
. We review facts found by the trial court to determine whether they are clearly erroneous. Section
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13141 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Wendy E. Olsen v. Wisconsin Health Care Liability Insurance Plan
) [sic] above, shall be paid to the Olsen- plaintiffs. ¶5 The lawsuit against Ohmeda went to trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5605 - 2017-09-19
) [sic] above, shall be paid to the Olsen- plaintiffs. ¶5 The lawsuit against Ohmeda went to trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5605 - 2017-09-19
Marathon County v. Edward F.W.
. § 51.20(1)(am) and an order denying his motion for a new trial. Edward contends the court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2623 - 2005-03-31
. § 51.20(1)(am) and an order denying his motion for a new trial. Edward contends the court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2623 - 2005-03-31
Edward Humpel v. Donald R. Meider
to determine the grantor's intent. They also contend that the trial court erroneously interpreted the document
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10175 - 2005-03-31
to determine the grantor's intent. They also contend that the trial court erroneously interpreted the document
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10175 - 2005-03-31
Douglas County Department of Human Services v. Susan L.
. The trial court’s duty to warn and inform the parent under § 48.356(2) is included in the “'panoply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12881 - 2005-03-31
. The trial court’s duty to warn and inform the parent under § 48.356(2) is included in the “'panoply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12881 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is made, the trial judge should inquire whether there are proper reasons for substitution.” Id., ¶66
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248157 - 2019-10-08
is made, the trial judge should inquire whether there are proper reasons for substitution.” Id., ¶66
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248157 - 2019-10-08