Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39771 - 39780 of 55732 for n y c.
Search results 39771 - 39780 of 55732 for n y c.
COURT OF APPEALS
dismiss the petition. (c) Make such inquiries as satisfactorily establish that there is a factual basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48077 - 2010-03-17
dismiss the petition. (c) Make such inquiries as satisfactorily establish that there is a factual basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48077 - 2010-03-17
State v. John V. Dundon, Jr.
at 207 n.8. ¶23 The crime of carrying a concealed weapon has many of the earmarks of a strict
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17263 - 2005-03-31
at 207 n.8. ¶23 The crime of carrying a concealed weapon has many of the earmarks of a strict
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17263 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jonathon Gils
contain “[a]n argument … contain[ing] the contention of the appellant [and] the reasons therefor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11826 - 2017-09-21
contain “[a]n argument … contain[ing] the contention of the appellant [and] the reasons therefor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11826 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
sixty days in which to file a reply brief contrary to the mandate in WIS. STAT. § 809.107(6)(c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=664341 - 2023-06-07
sixty days in which to file a reply brief contrary to the mandate in WIS. STAT. § 809.107(6)(c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=664341 - 2023-06-07
State v. George R. Bollig
by William C. Wolford, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was James E. Doyle, attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17418 - 2005-03-31
by William C. Wolford, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was James E. Doyle, attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17418 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
.2d 235 (1987). “[A]n accused is not entitled to the ideal, perfect defense or the best defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35700 - 2009-03-02
.2d 235 (1987). “[A]n accused is not entitled to the ideal, perfect defense or the best defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35700 - 2009-03-02
State v. Bernell L. Ross, Sr.
. Walker, 154 Wis. 2d at 176 n.11. ¶17 Because of the complexities of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4829 - 2005-03-31
. Walker, 154 Wis. 2d at 176 n.11. ¶17 Because of the complexities of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4829 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. George R. Bollig
-respondent the cause was argued by William C. Wolford, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17418 - 2017-09-21
-respondent the cause was argued by William C. Wolford, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17418 - 2017-09-21
Patricia A. Flejter v. Carl Flejter
, are construed to be in harmony if reasonably possible.” N. Singer, 2B Sutherland on Statutes and Statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16176 - 2005-03-31
, are construed to be in harmony if reasonably possible.” N. Singer, 2B Sutherland on Statutes and Statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16176 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI App 43
: On behalf of the plaintiff-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of Meg C. O’Marro, Vilas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244461 - 2019-09-17
: On behalf of the plaintiff-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of Meg C. O’Marro, Vilas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244461 - 2019-09-17