Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39771 - 39780 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 39771 - 39780 of 58492 for speedy trial.
State v. Thomas M. Fischer
affirm the trial court’s judgment. On May 29, 1998, at 3:47 a.m., Walworth County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14460 - 2005-03-31
affirm the trial court’s judgment. On May 29, 1998, at 3:47 a.m., Walworth County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14460 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on the inaccurate information.” Id., ¶31. Where trial counsel does not object to the information provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226304 - 2018-11-06
on the inaccurate information.” Id., ¶31. Where trial counsel does not object to the information provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226304 - 2018-11-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
arguable merit for appeal.3 We have reviewed the record including, without limitation, pre-trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=482241 - 2022-02-09
arguable merit for appeal.3 We have reviewed the record including, without limitation, pre-trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=482241 - 2022-02-09
[PDF]
Frank C. Kesselring v. Ellen K. Kesselring
, 470 N.W.2d 873 (1991). We will not reverse a discretionary determination by the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5891 - 2017-09-19
, 470 N.W.2d 873 (1991). We will not reverse a discretionary determination by the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5891 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. James C. Smith
two psychologists at trial. First, Dr. Anthony Jurek testified that Smith suffered from paraphilia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6661 - 2017-09-20
two psychologists at trial. First, Dr. Anthony Jurek testified that Smith suffered from paraphilia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6661 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Edward Humpel v. Donald R. Meider
to determine the grantor's intent. They also contend that the trial court erroneously interpreted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10175 - 2017-09-19
to determine the grantor's intent. They also contend that the trial court erroneously interpreted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10175 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with evidence of the deed transfer or move to be dismissed from the lawsuit prior to the scheduled trial date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81888 - 2014-09-15
with evidence of the deed transfer or move to be dismissed from the lawsuit prior to the scheduled trial date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81888 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and that trial and postconviction counsel were ineffective for failing to raise that claim. The circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=466472 - 2021-12-29
and that trial and postconviction counsel were ineffective for failing to raise that claim. The circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=466472 - 2021-12-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
trial be held. ¶6 W.E.L. also moved for postdisposition relief from the original commitment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240635 - 2019-05-15
trial be held. ¶6 W.E.L. also moved for postdisposition relief from the original commitment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240635 - 2019-05-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
further challenges the trial court’s decision to rescind an order for an interpreter during the pendency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82287 - 2014-09-15
further challenges the trial court’s decision to rescind an order for an interpreter during the pendency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82287 - 2014-09-15