Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39781 - 39790 of 59208 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 39781 - 39790 of 59208 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Marcella J. Hopp v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services
the value she claimed for it, $38,470.84. ¶4 This decision (Decision I) also included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5984 - 2005-03-31
the value she claimed for it, $38,470.84. ¶4 This decision (Decision I) also included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5984 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of the evidence to deny his discharge petition. Specifically, Williams claims the circuit court erred by denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103857 - 2013-11-04
of the evidence to deny his discharge petition. Specifically, Williams claims the circuit court erred by denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103857 - 2013-11-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in the no- merit report that there would be no arguable merit to a claim that the circuit court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1023939 - 2025-10-16
in the no- merit report that there would be no arguable merit to a claim that the circuit court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1023939 - 2025-10-16
Yourchuck Video, Inc. v. Burnett County
an order dismissing its claims against Burnett County.[1] Yourchuck’s complaint challenged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18803 - 2005-07-05
an order dismissing its claims against Burnett County.[1] Yourchuck’s complaint challenged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18803 - 2005-07-05
[PDF]
State v. Phillip M. Ross
address and reject Ross’s hearsay objection on the merits, we need not discuss Ross’s alternative claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18694 - 2017-09-21
address and reject Ross’s hearsay objection on the merits, we need not discuss Ross’s alternative claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18694 - 2017-09-21
State v. Scott H. Petersen
that his trial counsel ineffectively represented him. He bases his claim on the fact that his attorney did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12154 - 2005-03-31
that his trial counsel ineffectively represented him. He bases his claim on the fact that his attorney did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12154 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
omitted). We reject Amerstate’s due process claims. Amerstate was afforded a full opportunity
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=128512 - 2014-11-18
omitted). We reject Amerstate’s due process claims. Amerstate was afforded a full opportunity
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=128512 - 2014-11-18
State v. Kim D. Tesky
. The reason you can be imprisoned up to three years is because they claim that, due to prior convictions, you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11185 - 2005-03-31
. The reason you can be imprisoned up to three years is because they claim that, due to prior convictions, you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11185 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
prohibited by WIS. STAT. § 100.20 and WIS. ADMIN. CODE § ATCP 110, by making a claim of a binding contract
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54833 - 2014-09-15
prohibited by WIS. STAT. § 100.20 and WIS. ADMIN. CODE § ATCP 110, by making a claim of a binding contract
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54833 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. Johnson argues that the trial court should have suppressed the drug evidence because, he claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71744 - 2011-10-03
. Johnson argues that the trial court should have suppressed the drug evidence because, he claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71744 - 2011-10-03