Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3981 - 3990 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 3981 - 3990 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Samb and his ex-wife, Katherine Wagner, have one child together.2 Samb filed multiple motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1045102 - 2025-12-04
Samb and his ex-wife, Katherine Wagner, have one child together.2 Samb filed multiple motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1045102 - 2025-12-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Samb and his ex-wife, Katherine Wagner, have one child together.2 Samb filed multiple motions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1045102 - 2025-12-04
Samb and his ex-wife, Katherine Wagner, have one child together.2 Samb filed multiple motions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1045102 - 2025-12-04
COURT OF APPEALS
) (2007-08).[2] On appeal, Allen challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54389 - 2010-09-13
) (2007-08).[2] On appeal, Allen challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54389 - 2010-09-13
[PDF]
NOTICE
Martin J. Donald presided over the suppression motion that is the focus of this appeal. The Honorable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54389 - 2014-09-15
Martin J. Donald presided over the suppression motion that is the focus of this appeal. The Honorable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54389 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. § 971.31(10) allows a defendant to challenge an order denying a motion to suppress evidence despite
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161320 - 2017-09-21
. § 971.31(10) allows a defendant to challenge an order denying a motion to suppress evidence despite
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161320 - 2017-09-21
Laura K. Waterhouse v. Thomas A. Waterhouse
a motion contesting custody and visitation issues, and the support modification motion was placed on hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18094 - 2005-05-09
a motion contesting custody and visitation issues, and the support modification motion was placed on hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18094 - 2005-05-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). 5 In May 2020, Schneider filed a pro se motion seeking sentence credit in this case for in-custody
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=277008 - 2020-08-12
). 5 In May 2020, Schneider filed a pro se motion seeking sentence credit in this case for in-custody
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=277008 - 2020-08-12
George H. v. Nancy Fennema
Health Center to release him. He alleged he was taken into custody on the morning of September 21, 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9742 - 2005-03-31
Health Center to release him. He alleged he was taken into custody on the morning of September 21, 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9742 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
George H. v. Nancy Fennema
to release him. He alleged he was taken into custody on the morning of September 21, 1995, and held under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9742 - 2017-09-19
to release him. He alleged he was taken into custody on the morning of September 21, 1995, and held under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9742 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Thomas J.W.
1 The court, on its own motion, concluded that this case should be decided by a three- judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12110 - 2017-09-21
1 The court, on its own motion, concluded that this case should be decided by a three- judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12110 - 2017-09-21