Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39801 - 39810 of 61737 for does.

County of Dodge v. Curtis E. Dittberner
. § 971.31(10). That exception, however, does not apply to civil forfeiture matters. See County of Racine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16167 - 2005-03-31

State v. Donald C.
lawyer]: There is nothing cognitively wrong, but he does have a good deal of physical pain and he lost
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6706 - 2005-03-31

State v. Kevin N. Dornbrook
, a powerful piece of evidence against Dornbrook. This factor does not require that Dornbrook be allowed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15176 - 2005-03-31

Patricia Hebert v. Thomas J. Hebert
, contending the court misused its discretion. Because the trial court's decision to modify maintenance does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13091 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jose Trevino
analysis was based on the evidence, which does not include argument of counsel. And we have concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12630 - 2005-03-31

State v. Randall M. Miller
. ¶11 First, Miller does not cite to any authority for the proposition that an officer may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16238 - 2005-03-31

Dean Medical Center v. Karri P. Hubanks
offer three reasons for their assertion that the collection statement does not fit this hearsay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13364 - 2005-03-31

95-05 SCR Chapter 60
, communications with staff, and proceedings of the committee shall be confidential. Confidentiality does not apply
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1206 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
seriousness and the need to protect potential victims of other sexual predators does not make its sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73387 - 2011-11-07

Village of Oregon v. Robyn R. Sunday
the intrusion, the officer’s subjective motivation does not require suppression of the evidence or dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5899 - 2005-03-31